×




Mundell & Associates, Inc.; Managing When Faith Really Matters Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Mundell & Associates, Inc.; Managing When Faith Really Matters case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Mundell & Associates, Inc.; Managing When Faith Really Matters case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jeanne G Buckeye, John B Gallagher, Elizabeth Garlow. The Mundell & Associates, Inc.; Managing When Faith Really Matters (referred as “Eoc Faith” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Human resource management, Leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Mundell & Associates, Inc.; Managing When Faith Really Matters Case Study


The owner of Mundell & Associates is making plans to embark on a significant remake of the company culture. To that end, he is considering specific, concrete changes in company policies and practices in order to more fully embed his faith convictions and spiritual values in the culture of the company and the consciousness of employees. Those values have always been present and active in shaping the business; the company is one of the largest companies participating in the Economy of Communion (EOC) project, a worldwide, faith-based, effort to humanize economic activity through use of thoughtful business practices and profit redistribution. The owner is convinced that being an EOC company requires more than sharing profits or following particular practices. It means being an actual community, one marked by the involvement and engagement of all employees. The way forward is not at all clear and so the owner, and students, must consider several possible options, weigh the advantages and disadvantages of different organizational behavior approaches, and devise a concrete course of action.


Case Authors : Jeanne G Buckeye, John B Gallagher, Elizabeth Garlow

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Human resource management, Leadership




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Mundell & Associates, Inc.; Managing When Faith Really Matters Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006368) -10006368 - -
Year 1 3448542 -6557826 3448542 0.9434 3253342
Year 2 3953304 -2604522 7401846 0.89 3518426
Year 3 3941183 1336661 11343029 0.8396 3309093
Year 4 3240310 4576971 14583339 0.7921 2566629
TOTAL 14583339 12647490




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641122

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Eoc Faith have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Eoc Faith shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Mundell & Associates, Inc.; Managing When Faith Really Matters

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Eoc Faith often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Eoc Faith needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006368) -10006368 - -
Year 1 3448542 -6557826 3448542 0.8696 2998732
Year 2 3953304 -2604522 7401846 0.7561 2989266
Year 3 3941183 1336661 11343029 0.6575 2591392
Year 4 3240310 4576971 14583339 0.5718 1852658
TOTAL 10432048


The Net NPV after 4 years is 425680

(10432048 - 10006368 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006368) -10006368 - -
Year 1 3448542 -6557826 3448542 0.8333 2873785
Year 2 3953304 -2604522 7401846 0.6944 2745350
Year 3 3941183 1336661 11343029 0.5787 2280777
Year 4 3240310 4576971 14583339 0.4823 1562649
TOTAL 9462562


The Net NPV after 4 years is -543806

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9462562 - 10006368 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Eoc Faith to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Eoc Faith has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Eoc Faith can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Eoc Faith, then the stock price of the Eoc Faith should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Eoc Faith should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Mundell & Associates, Inc.; Managing When Faith Really Matters

References & Further Readings

Jeanne G Buckeye, John B Gallagher, Elizabeth Garlow (2018), "Mundell & Associates, Inc.; Managing When Faith Really Matters Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Cabot SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


S2 Resources Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Hiolle SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Monnalisa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Euroz SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Hartalega SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Orthopediatrics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Midong & Cinema SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Vertu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Wanhua Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber