×




Unilever's Mission for Vitality Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Unilever's Mission for Vitality case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Unilever's Mission for Vitality case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David Austen-Smith, Adam Galinsky, Katherine H. Chung, Christy LaVanway. The Unilever's Mission for Vitality (referred as “Dove Brands” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Organizational culture, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Unilever's Mission for Vitality Case Study


Dove and Axe were two highly successful brands owned by Unilever, a portfolio company. Dove was a female-oriented beauty product brand that exhorted "real beauty" and not the unachievable standards that the media portrayed. In contrast, Axe was a brand that purportedly "gives men the edge in the mating game." Their risquA? commercials always portrayed the supermodel-type beauty ideal that Dove was trying to change. Unilever had always been a company of brands where the consumer knew the brands but not the company, but recently there had been the idea to unify the company with an umbrella mission for all of its brands. This would turn Unilever into a company with brands, potentially increasing consumer awareness and encourage cross-purchases between the different brands. However, this raised questions about the conflicting messages between the brands' marketing campaigns, most notably between Unilever's two powerhouse brands, Dove and Axe. The case begins with COO Alan Jope anticipating an upcoming press meeting in New York City to discuss Unilever's current (i.e., 2005) performance and announce Unilever's decision to create an umbrella mission statement for the company. This case focuses on the central question of whether or not consistency between brand messages is necessary or inherently problematic.


Case Authors : David Austen-Smith, Adam Galinsky, Katherine H. Chung, Christy LaVanway

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Organizational culture, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Unilever's Mission for Vitality Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011436) -10011436 - -
Year 1 3467094 -6544342 3467094 0.9434 3270843
Year 2 3970529 -2573813 7437623 0.89 3533757
Year 3 3944570 1370757 11382193 0.8396 3311937
Year 4 3239383 4610140 14621576 0.7921 2565895
TOTAL 14621576 12682432




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670996

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Dove Brands have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Dove Brands shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Unilever's Mission for Vitality

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Dove Brands often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Dove Brands needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011436) -10011436 - -
Year 1 3467094 -6544342 3467094 0.8696 3014864
Year 2 3970529 -2573813 7437623 0.7561 3002290
Year 3 3944570 1370757 11382193 0.6575 2593619
Year 4 3239383 4610140 14621576 0.5718 1852128
TOTAL 10462901


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451465

(10462901 - 10011436 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011436) -10011436 - -
Year 1 3467094 -6544342 3467094 0.8333 2889245
Year 2 3970529 -2573813 7437623 0.6944 2757312
Year 3 3944570 1370757 11382193 0.5787 2282737
Year 4 3239383 4610140 14621576 0.4823 1562202
TOTAL 9491497


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519939

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491497 - 10011436 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Dove Brands to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Dove Brands has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Dove Brands can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Dove Brands, then the stock price of the Dove Brands should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Dove Brands should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Unilever's Mission for Vitality

References & Further Readings

David Austen-Smith, Adam Galinsky, Katherine H. Chung, Christy LaVanway (2018), "Unilever's Mission for Vitality Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Aoxin Q & M Dental SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


SHW AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Mehadrin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops


Hancock Jaffe Labs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Woorison F&G SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Genus Paper & Boards Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Mcpherson'S Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Jewelry & Silverware


Renzhi Oilfield A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


ODTech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Monalisa Group A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Shanghai Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods