×




A Crack in the Mug: Can Starbucks Mend It? Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for A Crack in the Mug: Can Starbucks Mend It? case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. A Crack in the Mug: Can Starbucks Mend It? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael Herriman, Motohiro Wanikawa, Ryoko Ichinose, Shobana Darak. The A Crack in the Mug: Can Starbucks Mend It? (referred as “Starbucks Jolted” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Intellectual property, Marketing, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of A Crack in the Mug: Can Starbucks Mend It? Case Study


After 20 years of rapid expansion, the last six months of 2007 saw Starbucks jolted by a decline in share price of 50 per cent and a decrease in customer visits. Its share price was hovering around $19 to $20. By mid-2008, it had declined to $18. Its fiscal first-quarter profit in 2007 rose by less than two per cent, and in January 2008, it announced the closing of 100 U.S. stores. In July, the number was increased to 600. The case was written to encourage classroom discussion and research into the company policy and marketing practices in order to discover the means for a possible turnaround of the company.


Case Authors : Michael Herriman, Motohiro Wanikawa, Ryoko Ichinose, Shobana Darak

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Intellectual property, Marketing, Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for A Crack in the Mug: Can Starbucks Mend It? Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009538) -10009538 - -
Year 1 3463153 -6546385 3463153 0.9434 3267125
Year 2 3956146 -2590239 7419299 0.89 3520956
Year 3 3956805 1366566 11376104 0.8396 3322210
Year 4 3232627 4599193 14608731 0.7921 2560543
TOTAL 14608731 12670834




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661296

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Starbucks Jolted shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Starbucks Jolted have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of A Crack in the Mug: Can Starbucks Mend It?

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Starbucks Jolted often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Starbucks Jolted needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009538) -10009538 - -
Year 1 3463153 -6546385 3463153 0.8696 3011437
Year 2 3956146 -2590239 7419299 0.7561 2991415
Year 3 3956805 1366566 11376104 0.6575 2601664
Year 4 3232627 4599193 14608731 0.5718 1848265
TOTAL 10452781


The Net NPV after 4 years is 443243

(10452781 - 10009538 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009538) -10009538 - -
Year 1 3463153 -6546385 3463153 0.8333 2885961
Year 2 3956146 -2590239 7419299 0.6944 2747324
Year 3 3956805 1366566 11376104 0.5787 2289818
Year 4 3232627 4599193 14608731 0.4823 1558944
TOTAL 9482047


The Net NPV after 4 years is -527491

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482047 - 10009538 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Starbucks Jolted to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Starbucks Jolted has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Starbucks Jolted can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Starbucks Jolted, then the stock price of the Starbucks Jolted should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Starbucks Jolted should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of A Crack in the Mug: Can Starbucks Mend It?

References & Further Readings

Michael Herriman, Motohiro Wanikawa, Ryoko Ichinose, Shobana Darak (2018), "A Crack in the Mug: Can Starbucks Mend It? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Andrea Electronic Cp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Quick Heal Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Shaanxi Construction Machinery SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Nickelore SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Ningbo Construction SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Seohwa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Differ Holding Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Dishman Carbogen Amcis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs