×




Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education (CARE): Leadership in Social Sector Organizations Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education (CARE): Leadership in Social Sector Organizations case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education (CARE): Leadership in Social Sector Organizations case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Arif Butt, Humaira Butt, Shezeen Hemani. The Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education (CARE): Leadership in Social Sector Organizations (referred as “Seema Care” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Organizational structure.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education (CARE): Leadership in Social Sector Organizations Case Study


This case documents the history and development of philanthropic work in providing quality education by CARE (Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education) under the leadership of its chairperson, Seema Aziz. Seema started CARE in 1988 as a small voluntary effort to help the flood victims of the Sheikhupura town, Lahore (Pakistan) and later directed the organization's focus towards providing quality education to underprivileged children. After over a decade of efforts which led to the establishment of 6 CARE owned schools and adoption of 20 schools from the Government of Punjab, Seema was faced with an important decision which would shape the future of CARE. In September 2002, the government of Punjab offered CARE to adopt another 140 government schools. The offer had left Seema at a crossroads as accepting the offer would achieve CARE's mission by accelerating the process of spreading education. However, it would invite challenges associated with managing a rapidly growing organization, providing for additional funds and other organizational resources, and establishing a professional and well motivated Human Resource base to support the expansion decision which would have to be taken within a few months. On the other hand, refusing the government's offer would enable Seema to take CARE through a gradual process of growth ensuring control over policymaking and implementation, minimizing risks related to financial sustainability, building organizational and human resource capacities and above all preparing leadership capabilities necessary for a growing organization. For Seema it was indeed a tough decision. She felt that as she contemplated the offer to prepare CARE to take up the challenge, thousands of children lost hope for basic education and an opportunity to live like the privileged part of the society. While Seema's heart was truly tempted to take up the government's offer, her mind was well aware that she must choose her options wisely.


Case Authors : Arif Butt, Humaira Butt, Shezeen Hemani

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Organizational structure




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education (CARE): Leadership in Social Sector Organizations Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003062) -10003062 - -
Year 1 3462195 -6540867 3462195 0.9434 3266222
Year 2 3973933 -2566934 7436128 0.89 3536786
Year 3 3943946 1377012 11380074 0.8396 3311413
Year 4 3232156 4609168 14612230 0.7921 2560170
TOTAL 14612230 12674591




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2671529

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Seema Care shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Seema Care have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education (CARE): Leadership in Social Sector Organizations

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Seema Care often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Seema Care needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003062) -10003062 - -
Year 1 3462195 -6540867 3462195 0.8696 3010604
Year 2 3973933 -2566934 7436128 0.7561 3004864
Year 3 3943946 1377012 11380074 0.6575 2593209
Year 4 3232156 4609168 14612230 0.5718 1847996
TOTAL 10456673


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453611

(10456673 - 10003062 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003062) -10003062 - -
Year 1 3462195 -6540867 3462195 0.8333 2885163
Year 2 3973933 -2566934 7436128 0.6944 2759676
Year 3 3943946 1377012 11380074 0.5787 2282376
Year 4 3232156 4609168 14612230 0.4823 1558717
TOTAL 9485932


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517130

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9485932 - 10003062 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Seema Care to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Seema Care has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Seema Care can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Seema Care, then the stock price of the Seema Care should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Seema Care should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education (CARE): Leadership in Social Sector Organizations

References & Further Readings

Arif Butt, Humaira Butt, Shezeen Hemani (2018), "Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education (CARE): Leadership in Social Sector Organizations Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


UnipolSai Assicurazioni SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Rightscorp, Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Zhong Tong Bus A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


AT&T SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Essentra SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Security Systems & Services


UKF SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.