×




Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by R. Morgan Gould, Michael Stanford. The Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization (referred as “Spaghetti Kolind” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Manufacturing, Motivating people, Organizational structure, Reorganization.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization Case Study


In 1990, Lars Kolind decides to abandon his plan to move Oticon A/S headquarters, but insists on the pursuit of his vision for what he now calls the spaghetti organization--so named because of its relative lack of structure. Shortly after implementation, the company suffers further financial losses. A new managing director, brought in by Kolind, begins to address the financial dynamics of Oticon A/S. Within six months, profitability is restored, and by 1993, the company enjoys its greatest profit since its founding in 1904. Has Kolind achieved the competitive advantage he sought with this new organization? Can the spectacular financial success be attributed to the spaghetti organization? How can the new organization be sustained in the years to come? A 1994 EFMD award winner.


Case Authors : R. Morgan Gould, Michael Stanford

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Manufacturing, Motivating people, Organizational structure, Reorganization




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019147) -10019147 - -
Year 1 3444273 -6574874 3444273 0.9434 3249314
Year 2 3960869 -2614005 7405142 0.89 3525159
Year 3 3955999 1341994 11361141 0.8396 3321533
Year 4 3222939 4564933 14584080 0.7921 2552870
TOTAL 14584080 12648876




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2629729

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Spaghetti Kolind have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Spaghetti Kolind shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Spaghetti Kolind often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Spaghetti Kolind needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019147) -10019147 - -
Year 1 3444273 -6574874 3444273 0.8696 2995020
Year 2 3960869 -2614005 7405142 0.7561 2994986
Year 3 3955999 1341994 11361141 0.6575 2601134
Year 4 3222939 4564933 14584080 0.5718 1842726
TOTAL 10433865


The Net NPV after 4 years is 414718

(10433865 - 10019147 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019147) -10019147 - -
Year 1 3444273 -6574874 3444273 0.8333 2870228
Year 2 3960869 -2614005 7405142 0.6944 2750603
Year 3 3955999 1341994 11361141 0.5787 2289351
Year 4 3222939 4564933 14584080 0.4823 1554272
TOTAL 9464455


The Net NPV after 4 years is -554692

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9464455 - 10019147 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Spaghetti Kolind to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Spaghetti Kolind has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Spaghetti Kolind can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Spaghetti Kolind, then the stock price of the Spaghetti Kolind should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Spaghetti Kolind should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization

References & Further Readings

R. Morgan Gould, Michael Stanford (2018), "Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Explore More

Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.

You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Revolution at Oticon A/S (B): Acquiring Change Competence in a "Spaghetti" Organization


PLASCAR PART ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Builders FirstSource SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Home Improvement)


Lisi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Indocement Tunggal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Green Flash SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Sejong Industrial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Sun Cheong Creative Development SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


SCOR PK SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Greengro Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Golden Pharos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


Danaos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation