McKinsey & Co.-Protecting its Reputation (A), Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for McKinsey & Co.-Protecting its Reputation (A), Spanish Version case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. McKinsey & Co.-Protecting its Reputation (A), Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jay W. Lorsch, Emily McTague. The McKinsey & Co.-Protecting its Reputation (A), Spanish Version (referred as “Mckinsey Galleon” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate governance, Ethics, Joint ventures, Public relations, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of McKinsey & Co.-Protecting its Reputation (A), Spanish Version Case Study

On Tuesday March 15, 2011, all 1,200 global Partners of McKinsey & Co. gathered at the Gaylord National Hotel & Convention Center near Washington, DC for their annual Partners' conference. The atmosphere was tense as Partners, in addition to their normal agenda, discussed the Galleon Group insider-trading trial and the recent allegations against the Firm's former Managing Director, Rajat Gupta. Three months earlier Senior Partner, Anil Kumar, plead guilty to providing confidential information about McKinsey clients he served to Galleon Group founder Raj Rajaratnam. The McKinsey Partners were shocked and dismayed by the actions of Kumar, as well as the recent allegations against Gupta and were closely monitoring the situation. Could a former Managing Director of their Firm have conspired to enable insider trading? And if so, what did that mean for the future of the Firm?

Case Authors : Jay W. Lorsch, Emily McTague

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Corporate governance, Ethics, Joint ventures, Public relations, Risk management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for McKinsey & Co.-Protecting its Reputation (A), Spanish Version Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029607)	-10029607	-	-
Year 1	3454087	-6575520	3454087	0.9434	3258573
Year 2	3955257	-2620263	7409344	0.89	3520165
Year 3	3958668	1338405	11368012	0.8396	3323774
Year 4	3225377	4563782	14593389	0.7921	2554801
TOTAL			14593389		12657312

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2627705

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Mckinsey Galleon shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Mckinsey Galleon have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of McKinsey & Co.-Protecting its Reputation (A), Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Mckinsey Galleon often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Mckinsey Galleon needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029607)	-10029607	-	-
Year 1	3454087	-6575520	3454087	0.8696	3003554
Year 2	3955257	-2620263	7409344	0.7561	2990743
Year 3	3958668	1338405	11368012	0.6575	2602888
Year 4	3225377	4563782	14593389	0.5718	1844120
TOTAL					10441305

The Net NPV after 4 years is 411698

(10441305 - 10029607 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029607)	-10029607	-	-
Year 1	3454087	-6575520	3454087	0.8333	2878406
Year 2	3955257	-2620263	7409344	0.6944	2746706
Year 3	3958668	1338405	11368012	0.5787	2290896
Year 4	3225377	4563782	14593389	0.4823	1555448
TOTAL					9471456

The Net NPV after 4 years is -558151

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9471456 - 10029607 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Mckinsey Galleon to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Mckinsey Galleon has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Mckinsey Galleon can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Mckinsey Galleon, then the stock price of the Mckinsey Galleon should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Mckinsey Galleon should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of McKinsey & Co.-Protecting its Reputation (A), Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Jay W. Lorsch, Emily McTague (2018), "McKinsey & Co.-Protecting its Reputation (A), Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.