×




Innovation at the Lego Group (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Innovation at the Lego Group (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Innovation at the Lego Group (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David Robertson, Robert J. Crawford. The Innovation at the Lego Group (A) (referred as “Lego Innovation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Innovation at the Lego Group (A) Case Study


The case tells the story of a company where innovation is tremendously important, but not working well. In 2003, the LEGO Group had a number of positive attributes: it had a well-respected brand with some very good toy lines. It had a passionate customer base that in many areas was more sophisticated than its internal designers. And it had been able to extend the brand into many areas such as toys, games, clothing, theme parks, movies, and many others types of play, earning significant revenues (but not profits). But, in 2003, the company had gotten itself into deep trouble. Over the previous 5-10 years, the toy industry had been changing dramatically in ways that did not favor the LEGO Group. These changes, coupled with some poorly planned investments and a downturn in the sales of some important toy lines, combined to almost put the LEGO Group out of business. The company lost nearly DKK 1 billion in 2003 and its cash dwindled dangerously low. This was the largest loss in the history of the company, and many analysts believed that bankruptcy and perhaps even the breakup and sale of the company were likely. The company quickly sold off assets, reduced headcount, and outsourced production to cut costs and generate cash. But it knew, to turn around the company, it had to improve its overall innovation system. It had to improve the time to market, success rate, and profitability in its innovation system. The case presents a number of representative challenges that LEGO was facing during 2004 and beyond. Learning objectives: 1) How to restructure an innovation system. 2) How to encourage all types of innovation (innovation in pricing, business model, channel to market, branding, customer experience, etc.) and coordinate these innovations across the company. 3) How to involve external parties such as customers, complementary product producers, and external inventors in your innovation system.


Case Authors : David Robertson, Robert J. Crawford

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Innovation at the Lego Group (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009190) -10009190 - -
Year 1 3458156 -6551034 3458156 0.9434 3262411
Year 2 3980612 -2570422 7438768 0.89 3542731
Year 3 3941861 1371439 11380629 0.8396 3309663
Year 4 3240927 4612366 14621556 0.7921 2567118
TOTAL 14621556 12681922




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672732

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Lego Innovation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Lego Innovation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Innovation at the Lego Group (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Lego Innovation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Lego Innovation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009190) -10009190 - -
Year 1 3458156 -6551034 3458156 0.8696 3007092
Year 2 3980612 -2570422 7438768 0.7561 3009915
Year 3 3941861 1371439 11380629 0.6575 2591838
Year 4 3240927 4612366 14621556 0.5718 1853011
TOTAL 10461855


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452665

(10461855 - 10009190 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009190) -10009190 - -
Year 1 3458156 -6551034 3458156 0.8333 2881797
Year 2 3980612 -2570422 7438768 0.6944 2764314
Year 3 3941861 1371439 11380629 0.5787 2281170
Year 4 3240927 4612366 14621556 0.4823 1562947
TOTAL 9490227


The Net NPV after 4 years is -518963

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490227 - 10009190 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Lego Innovation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Lego Innovation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Lego Innovation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Lego Innovation, then the stock price of the Lego Innovation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Lego Innovation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Innovation at the Lego Group (A)

References & Further Readings

David Robertson, Robert J. Crawford (2018), "Innovation at the Lego Group (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Legacy Acquisition SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Morinaga Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Myungmoon Phar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Alconix Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Ellex Medical Lasers Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Smart Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


GDI Property Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Lafargeholcim ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Templeton Global Growth SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Integra Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver