×




Motorola Corp.: The View from the CEO Office Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Motorola Corp.: The View from the CEO Office case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Motorola Corp.: The View from the CEO Office case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Janis L. Gogan, Shoshana Zuboff, Gloria Schuck. The Motorola Corp.: The View from the CEO Office (referred as “Motorola Continuous” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Leadership, Leading teams, Product development, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Motorola Corp.: The View from the CEO Office Case Study


Motorola, a leader in semiconductors and telecommunications, embarked on an ambitious program of renewal beginning in the early 1980s, leading to dramatic improvements in the company's quality, cycle time, and growth. Much of this progress was attributed to a major investment in workers' skills and in mechanisms that encouraged teams of employees to work on continuous improvement projects. In 1994 top management considered whether to promote a corporate-wide empowerment initiative that would encourage an unprecedented downward delegation of responsibilities. With very ambitious global growth goals, Motorola aspired to be "the finest corporation in the world," with an organization that was both more flexible and participative and dedicated to continuous improvement. The case focuses on the role of the CEO office in promoting corporate initiatives while preserving the $17 billion corporation's decentralized structure.


Case Authors : Janis L. Gogan, Shoshana Zuboff, Gloria Schuck

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Leadership, Leading teams, Product development, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Motorola Corp.: The View from the CEO Office Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027898) -10027898 - -
Year 1 3472702 -6555196 3472702 0.9434 3276134
Year 2 3970057 -2585139 7442759 0.89 3533337
Year 3 3944131 1358992 11386890 0.8396 3311568
Year 4 3242830 4601822 14629720 0.7921 2568625
TOTAL 14629720 12689664




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661766

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Motorola Continuous have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Motorola Continuous shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Motorola Corp.: The View from the CEO Office

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Motorola Continuous often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Motorola Continuous needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027898) -10027898 - -
Year 1 3472702 -6555196 3472702 0.8696 3019741
Year 2 3970057 -2585139 7442759 0.7561 3001933
Year 3 3944131 1358992 11386890 0.6575 2593330
Year 4 3242830 4601822 14629720 0.5718 1854099
TOTAL 10469103


The Net NPV after 4 years is 441205

(10469103 - 10027898 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027898) -10027898 - -
Year 1 3472702 -6555196 3472702 0.8333 2893918
Year 2 3970057 -2585139 7442759 0.6944 2756984
Year 3 3944131 1358992 11386890 0.5787 2282483
Year 4 3242830 4601822 14629720 0.4823 1563865
TOTAL 9497250


The Net NPV after 4 years is -530648

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497250 - 10027898 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Motorola Continuous to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Motorola Continuous has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Motorola Continuous can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Motorola Continuous, then the stock price of the Motorola Continuous should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Motorola Continuous should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Motorola Corp.: The View from the CEO Office

References & Further Readings

Janis L. Gogan, Shoshana Zuboff, Gloria Schuck (2018), "Motorola Corp.: The View from the CEO Office Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Zhejiang Dayuan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Renault SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Life Settlement SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Yongsheng Advanced Materials SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Bridgetec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Tongda Group Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Asia Pacific A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


KOP Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures