The New Pay Plan: Summertime and the Livin's Not Easy! Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The New Pay Plan: Summertime and the Livin's Not Easy! case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The New Pay Plan: Summertime and the Livin's Not Easy! case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Thomas R. Miller. The The New Pay Plan: Summertime and the Livin's Not Easy! (referred as “Summer Winston” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Motivating people, Organizational culture.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of The New Pay Plan: Summertime and the Livin's Not Easy! Case Study

Dr. Fred Carroll, a professor at Regency State, a large university in the Southeast, stopped in to talk to his department chairman, Dr. Ken Winston, about a likely change in the summer faculty pay plan. Rumors were circulating that summer teaching compensation would be cut. Winston, in an uncomfortable situation, replied that the College faced a serious budget shortfall, and the administration was looking at ways to reduce costs, in particular, the high costs of summer instruction. Carroll, who formerly had been a department chair, countered that summer compensation was just one of many possible areas for reducing costs and identified several other options. He did not accept the explanation that the budget must be balanced by reducing summer pay, and remarked that it was unfair, even discriminatory, and contrary to University policy. He vowed to investigate the situation and talk with Winston again. Along with Carroll several other faculty members had expressed their concerns about changes in summer pay to Winston. Faculty summer pay at Regency State was based on a percentage formula that was tied to the faculty member's academic year; those with higher salaries earned higher pay for a summer course. To reduce the summer compensation budget by about 25%, the dean, associate dean, and department chairs were looking at various ways of cutting costs. With the tradition of many year-round students and large summer enrollments, many faculty members were accustomed to getting significant summer pay to supplement their academic-year salaries. Winston, along with the other College administrators, were challenged in identifying alternatives and finding a satisfactory solution to the budget problem that would reduce summer compensation costs yet minimize adverse effects on faculty morale.

Case Authors : Thomas R. Miller

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Motivating people, Organizational culture

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The New Pay Plan: Summertime and the Livin's Not Easy! Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013566) -10013566 - -
Year 1 3470304 -6543262 3470304 0.9434 3273872
Year 2 3955799 -2587463 7426103 0.89 3520647
Year 3 3955217 1367754 11381320 0.8396 3320876
Year 4 3224774 4592528 14606094 0.7921 2554323
TOTAL 14606094 12669718

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656152

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Summer Winston have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Summer Winston shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The New Pay Plan: Summertime and the Livin's Not Easy!

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Summer Winston often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Summer Winston needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013566) -10013566 - -
Year 1 3470304 -6543262 3470304 0.8696 3017656
Year 2 3955799 -2587463 7426103 0.7561 2991152
Year 3 3955217 1367754 11381320 0.6575 2600619
Year 4 3224774 4592528 14606094 0.5718 1843775
TOTAL 10453202

The Net NPV after 4 years is 439636

(10453202 - 10013566 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013566) -10013566 - -
Year 1 3470304 -6543262 3470304 0.8333 2891920
Year 2 3955799 -2587463 7426103 0.6944 2747083
Year 3 3955217 1367754 11381320 0.5787 2288899
Year 4 3224774 4592528 14606094 0.4823 1555157
TOTAL 9483059

The Net NPV after 4 years is -530507

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483059 - 10013566 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Summer Winston to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Summer Winston has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Summer Winston can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Summer Winston, then the stock price of the Summer Winston should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Summer Winston should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

References & Further Readings

Thomas R. Miller (2018), "The New Pay Plan: Summertime and the Livin's Not Easy! Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.