×




Paradox of Coordination and Control Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Paradox of Coordination and Control case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Paradox of Coordination and Control case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jody Hoffer Gittell. The Paradox of Coordination and Control (referred as “Coordination Accountability” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Developing employees, Organizational structure.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Paradox of Coordination and Control Case Study


This article describes the contrasting systems of coordination and control at American and Southwest Airlines. Contrary to popular belief, the best way to achieve coordination in high velocity settings like the airline industry is not to create a flat organization based on performance measurement and little supervision. Rather it is better to build an organization based on cross-functional accountability to diffuse blame, with adequate supervisory staffing to provide coaching and feedback. Coordination benefits from strengthening this role of supervisors while weakening the role of accountability and performance measurement.


Case Authors : Jody Hoffer Gittell

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Developing employees, Organizational structure




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Paradox of Coordination and Control Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010564) -10010564 - -
Year 1 3465676 -6544888 3465676 0.9434 3269506
Year 2 3954145 -2590743 7419821 0.89 3519175
Year 3 3943764 1353021 11363585 0.8396 3311260
Year 4 3223457 4576478 14587042 0.7921 2553280
TOTAL 14587042 12653221




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2642657

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Coordination Accountability shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Coordination Accountability have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Paradox of Coordination and Control

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Coordination Accountability often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Coordination Accountability needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010564) -10010564 - -
Year 1 3465676 -6544888 3465676 0.8696 3013631
Year 2 3954145 -2590743 7419821 0.7561 2989902
Year 3 3943764 1353021 11363585 0.6575 2593089
Year 4 3223457 4576478 14587042 0.5718 1843022
TOTAL 10439644


The Net NPV after 4 years is 429080

(10439644 - 10010564 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010564) -10010564 - -
Year 1 3465676 -6544888 3465676 0.8333 2888063
Year 2 3954145 -2590743 7419821 0.6944 2745934
Year 3 3943764 1353021 11363585 0.5787 2282271
Year 4 3223457 4576478 14587042 0.4823 1554522
TOTAL 9470790


The Net NPV after 4 years is -539774

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9470790 - 10010564 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Coordination Accountability to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Coordination Accountability has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Coordination Accountability can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Coordination Accountability, then the stock price of the Coordination Accountability should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Coordination Accountability should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Paradox of Coordination and Control

References & Further Readings

Jody Hoffer Gittell (2018), "Paradox of Coordination and Control Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Nf Foodstuff A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Ordina SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Networks


Maruka Machinery SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Kellogg SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


GTT Com SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Look Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


BRT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Green Brick Partners Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Pmco Crp&In SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Huazhang Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Subsea 7 ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


New Century Hong Kong SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities