×




Sony Ericsson: Marketing the Next Music Phone Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Sony Ericsson: Marketing the Next Music Phone case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Sony Ericsson: Marketing the Next Music Phone case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Qiu Cheng, Zane Moi. The Sony Ericsson: Marketing the Next Music Phone (referred as “Sony Ericsson” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Product development, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Sony Ericsson: Marketing the Next Music Phone Case Study


Coming off its global success of marketing mobile handsets which featured embedded digital cameras, Sony Ericsson planned to launch a new series of handsets which featured digital music playback capabilities in 2005. Beginning in 2004, Sony Ericsson's competitors, such as Motorola and Nokia had begun to develop digital music content delivery and mobile handset strategies, at the same time Sony Ericsson was developing its own. The case illustrates some of the issues that mobile phone, or more broadly, consumer electronics manufacturers and distributors need to take into consideration when developing product management and product marketing strategies for new products in developing categories. The case also attempts to highlight some of the complexities that exist in marketing "convergent" products, where service delivery partnerships and competition with non-traditional handset vendors needs to be taken into consideration. Finally, the case also focuses on the strategic use of cross-product brand extensions where, in reality Sony Ericsson ended up licensing the Sony "Walkman" brand name to promote what has ended up being a successful line of music oriented mobile handsets.


Case Authors : Qiu Cheng, Zane Moi

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : International business, Product development, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Sony Ericsson: Marketing the Next Music Phone Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005418) -10005418 - -
Year 1 3464706 -6540712 3464706 0.9434 3268591
Year 2 3972944 -2567768 7437650 0.89 3535906
Year 3 3953187 1385419 11390837 0.8396 3319172
Year 4 3222683 4608102 14613520 0.7921 2552667
TOTAL 14613520 12676335




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670917

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Sony Ericsson shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Sony Ericsson have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Sony Ericsson: Marketing the Next Music Phone

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Sony Ericsson often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Sony Ericsson needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005418) -10005418 - -
Year 1 3464706 -6540712 3464706 0.8696 3012788
Year 2 3972944 -2567768 7437650 0.7561 3004116
Year 3 3953187 1385419 11390837 0.6575 2599285
Year 4 3222683 4608102 14613520 0.5718 1842579
TOTAL 10458768


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453350

(10458768 - 10005418 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005418) -10005418 - -
Year 1 3464706 -6540712 3464706 0.8333 2887255
Year 2 3972944 -2567768 7437650 0.6944 2758989
Year 3 3953187 1385419 11390837 0.5787 2287724
Year 4 3222683 4608102 14613520 0.4823 1554149
TOTAL 9488117


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517301

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488117 - 10005418 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Sony Ericsson to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Sony Ericsson has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Sony Ericsson can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Sony Ericsson, then the stock price of the Sony Ericsson should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Sony Ericsson should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Sony Ericsson: Marketing the Next Music Phone

References & Further Readings

Qiu Cheng, Zane Moi (2018), "Sony Ericsson: Marketing the Next Music Phone Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Sacheon Aerospace SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Crucialtec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Shanxi Sanwei Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Molori Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


CWT Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


DryShips SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


KPR Mill SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Scandium Interna SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Nanogate AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


HKEX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Banca Generali SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services