×




NOC Project in Dilemma: Plight of Schedule Control of an Overseas EPC Project Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for NOC Project in Dilemma: Plight of Schedule Control of an Overseas EPC Project case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. NOC Project in Dilemma: Plight of Schedule Control of an Overseas EPC Project case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ning Zhou, Xiaoting Han, Jinyong Shen, Tingting Hu. The NOC Project in Dilemma: Plight of Schedule Control of an Overseas EPC Project (referred as “Project Noc” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of NOC Project in Dilemma: Plight of Schedule Control of an Overseas EPC Project Case Study


This case tells a series of schedule delay issues that CBMI Construction Co., Ltd., encountered during the implementation of the NOC project of transnational cooperation. Under triple pressures including industry winter, group merger and industry chain continuation, CBMI signed the cement plant construction project in the Republic of Benin with demanding schedule through active exploration of overseas markets and EPC project management model. As the first cement plant construction project carried out in the Republic of Benin and the first project signed after a year of zero project signing, CBMI has attached great importance and coordinated all departments' resources to be fully engaged in the operation of the project. However, the factors including harsh natural environment, complexity of project management organization, resource conflicts and differences between Chinese and Western cultures have seriously affected the smooth progress of the project, making the NOC project schedule fall into the dilemma. This case demonstrates the methods and measures to crack the NOC project progress puzzle with the use of critical chain technique through in-depth analysis of influencing factors on project progress.


Case Authors : Ning Zhou, Xiaoting Han, Jinyong Shen, Tingting Hu

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for NOC Project in Dilemma: Plight of Schedule Control of an Overseas EPC Project Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024752) -10024752 - -
Year 1 3467216 -6557536 3467216 0.9434 3270958
Year 2 3957303 -2600233 7424519 0.89 3521986
Year 3 3967463 1367230 11391982 0.8396 3331158
Year 4 3230127 4597357 14622109 0.7921 2558563
TOTAL 14622109 12682666




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2657914

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Project Noc have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Project Noc shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of NOC Project in Dilemma: Plight of Schedule Control of an Overseas EPC Project

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Project Noc often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Project Noc needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024752) -10024752 - -
Year 1 3467216 -6557536 3467216 0.8696 3014970
Year 2 3957303 -2600233 7424519 0.7561 2992290
Year 3 3967463 1367230 11391982 0.6575 2608671
Year 4 3230127 4597357 14622109 0.5718 1846836
TOTAL 10462767


The Net NPV after 4 years is 438015

(10462767 - 10024752 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024752) -10024752 - -
Year 1 3467216 -6557536 3467216 0.8333 2889347
Year 2 3957303 -2600233 7424519 0.6944 2748127
Year 3 3967463 1367230 11391982 0.5787 2295986
Year 4 3230127 4597357 14622109 0.4823 1557739
TOTAL 9491198


The Net NPV after 4 years is -533554

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491198 - 10024752 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Project Noc to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Project Noc has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Project Noc can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Project Noc, then the stock price of the Project Noc should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Project Noc should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of NOC Project in Dilemma: Plight of Schedule Control of an Overseas EPC Project

References & Further Readings

Ning Zhou, Xiaoting Han, Jinyong Shen, Tingting Hu (2018), "NOC Project in Dilemma: Plight of Schedule Control of an Overseas EPC Project Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


HealthStream SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Annada Titanium A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Sempio Foods SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


WCT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Pacific Assets SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Genexine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Sato Sho Ji Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Time Technoplast SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities