×




Sony-FIFA Partnership Marketing Program: The Value of Sponsorship Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Sony-FIFA Partnership Marketing Program: The Value of Sponsorship case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Sony-FIFA Partnership Marketing Program: The Value of Sponsorship case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mark Jeffery, Saurabh Mishra. The Sony-FIFA Partnership Marketing Program: The Value of Sponsorship (referred as “Fifa Sony” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Performance measurement, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Sony-FIFA Partnership Marketing Program: The Value of Sponsorship Case Study


On April 6, 2005, Sony Corporation announced the signing of a global partnership program contract with the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) and the organizer of the FIFA World Cup. The contract, which represented the first global marketing and communications platform for the Sony Group, would run from 2007 to 2014 with a contract value (excluding services and product leases) of 33.0 billion yen (approximately $305 million). This was a very significant marketing investment for Sony, since the cost of event sponsorship with advertising was typically two or three times the cost of the sponsorship rights; hence, Sony was potentially investing a billion dollars or more on FIFA-related marketing campaigns over the next several years. Many Sony senior executives were questioning the return on investment (ROI) of the FIFA sponsorship opportunity.


Case Authors : Mark Jeffery, Saurabh Mishra

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Marketing, Performance measurement, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Sony-FIFA Partnership Marketing Program: The Value of Sponsorship Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013959) -10013959 - -
Year 1 3458961 -6554998 3458961 0.9434 3263171
Year 2 3981335 -2573663 7440296 0.89 3543374
Year 3 3940269 1366606 11380565 0.8396 3308326
Year 4 3244215 4610821 14624780 0.7921 2569722
TOTAL 14624780 12684593




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670634

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fifa Sony have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fifa Sony shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Sony-FIFA Partnership Marketing Program: The Value of Sponsorship

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fifa Sony often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fifa Sony needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013959) -10013959 - -
Year 1 3458961 -6554998 3458961 0.8696 3007792
Year 2 3981335 -2573663 7440296 0.7561 3010461
Year 3 3940269 1366606 11380565 0.6575 2590791
Year 4 3244215 4610821 14624780 0.5718 1854890
TOTAL 10463935


The Net NPV after 4 years is 449976

(10463935 - 10013959 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013959) -10013959 - -
Year 1 3458961 -6554998 3458961 0.8333 2882468
Year 2 3981335 -2573663 7440296 0.6944 2764816
Year 3 3940269 1366606 11380565 0.5787 2280248
Year 4 3244215 4610821 14624780 0.4823 1564533
TOTAL 9492064


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521895

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492064 - 10013959 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fifa Sony to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fifa Sony has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fifa Sony can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fifa Sony, then the stock price of the Fifa Sony should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fifa Sony should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Sony-FIFA Partnership Marketing Program: The Value of Sponsorship

References & Further Readings

Mark Jeffery, Saurabh Mishra (2018), "Sony-FIFA Partnership Marketing Program: The Value of Sponsorship Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Mediclinic Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Nitto Seimo Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


NU World Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Stock Spirit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Mitie SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


OpGen SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


BRASILAGRO ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops


KLab Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Networks


GL Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Hotels & Motels