×




Roof for the South--Building with Love: FUPROVI-Repretel-Mutual Heredia, Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Roof for the South--Building with Love: FUPROVI-Repretel-Mutual Heredia, Spanish Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Roof for the South--Building with Love: FUPROVI-Repretel-Mutual Heredia, Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jesus Revilla, Julio Sergio Ramirez. The Roof for the South--Building with Love: FUPROVI-Repretel-Mutual Heredia, Spanish Version (referred as “Fuprovi Heredia” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Joint ventures, Social enterprise, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Roof for the South--Building with Love: FUPROVI-Repretel-Mutual Heredia, Spanish Version Case Study


Describes the relationship between the Foundation for Housing Promotion (FUPROVI), Representaciones Televisivas (Repretel), and Mutual Heredia. The partnership was built to respond to the emergency situation affecting the south of Costa Rica after Hurricane Caesar hit the area in July 1996. A campaign was launched to raise funds to build houses for the families that had been left homeless. Deals with the description of the "A Roof for the South--Building with Love" campaign, the joint venture undertaken by the above-mentioned organizations. FUPROVI's executive director needed to determine the characteristics potential partner organizations should have for successful and lasting future partnerships.


Case Authors : Jesus Revilla, Julio Sergio Ramirez

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Joint ventures, Social enterprise, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Roof for the South--Building with Love: FUPROVI-Repretel-Mutual Heredia, Spanish Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020525) -10020525 - -
Year 1 3471918 -6548607 3471918 0.9434 3275394
Year 2 3976037 -2572570 7447955 0.89 3538659
Year 3 3957753 1385183 11405708 0.8396 3323006
Year 4 3232778 4617961 14638486 0.7921 2560663
TOTAL 14638486 12697722




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2677197

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fuprovi Heredia have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fuprovi Heredia shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Roof for the South--Building with Love: FUPROVI-Repretel-Mutual Heredia, Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fuprovi Heredia often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fuprovi Heredia needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020525) -10020525 - -
Year 1 3471918 -6548607 3471918 0.8696 3019059
Year 2 3976037 -2572570 7447955 0.7561 3006455
Year 3 3957753 1385183 11405708 0.6575 2602287
Year 4 3232778 4617961 14638486 0.5718 1848351
TOTAL 10476152


The Net NPV after 4 years is 455627

(10476152 - 10020525 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020525) -10020525 - -
Year 1 3471918 -6548607 3471918 0.8333 2893265
Year 2 3976037 -2572570 7447955 0.6944 2761137
Year 3 3957753 1385183 11405708 0.5787 2290366
Year 4 3232778 4617961 14638486 0.4823 1559017
TOTAL 9503785


The Net NPV after 4 years is -516740

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9503785 - 10020525 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fuprovi Heredia to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fuprovi Heredia has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fuprovi Heredia can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fuprovi Heredia, then the stock price of the Fuprovi Heredia should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fuprovi Heredia should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Roof for the South--Building with Love: FUPROVI-Repretel-Mutual Heredia, Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Jesus Revilla, Julio Sergio Ramirez (2018), "Roof for the South--Building with Love: FUPROVI-Repretel-Mutual Heredia, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hf Foods SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Asmo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Restaurants


Kawasaki Heavy Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


CEDRO PN SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


City Office SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


BP Midstream Partners SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


MYnd Analytics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


MISC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation