×




Cyberport: Realisation of an IT Park Through a Public-Private Partnership Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Cyberport: Realisation of an IT Park Through a Public-Private Partnership case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Cyberport: Realisation of an IT Park Through a Public-Private Partnership case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ali Farhoomand, Jeroen Van Den Berg. The Cyberport: Realisation of an IT Park Through a Public-Private Partnership (referred as “Cyberport Ppp” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Government, Internet, Joint ventures.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Cyberport: Realisation of an IT Park Through a Public-Private Partnership Case Study


As Hong Kong emerged from the Asian recession in March 1999, a landmark real estate development was announced. The $2 billion development known as "Cyberport" was intended to create a strategic cluster of quality IT and IT-related companies that would help Hong Kong become the leading digital city within the region. To realize the project, a public private partnership (PPP) agreement was signed between the government and a company led by Richard Li, son of Li Ka-Shing. Examines the events leading up to the PPP agreement and evaluates the government's investment.


Case Authors : Ali Farhoomand, Jeroen Van Den Berg

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Government, Internet, Joint ventures




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Cyberport: Realisation of an IT Park Through a Public-Private Partnership Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000417) -10000417 - -
Year 1 3470989 -6529428 3470989 0.9434 3274518
Year 2 3979877 -2549551 7450866 0.89 3542076
Year 3 3939408 1389857 11390274 0.8396 3307603
Year 4 3226448 4616305 14616722 0.7921 2555649
TOTAL 14616722 12679846




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2679429

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cyberport Ppp shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cyberport Ppp have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Cyberport: Realisation of an IT Park Through a Public-Private Partnership

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cyberport Ppp often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cyberport Ppp needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000417) -10000417 - -
Year 1 3470989 -6529428 3470989 0.8696 3018251
Year 2 3979877 -2549551 7450866 0.7561 3009359
Year 3 3939408 1389857 11390274 0.6575 2590225
Year 4 3226448 4616305 14616722 0.5718 1844732
TOTAL 10462567


The Net NPV after 4 years is 462150

(10462567 - 10000417 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000417) -10000417 - -
Year 1 3470989 -6529428 3470989 0.8333 2892491
Year 2 3979877 -2549551 7450866 0.6944 2763803
Year 3 3939408 1389857 11390274 0.5787 2279750
Year 4 3226448 4616305 14616722 0.4823 1555965
TOTAL 9492009


The Net NPV after 4 years is -508408

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492009 - 10000417 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cyberport Ppp to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cyberport Ppp has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cyberport Ppp can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cyberport Ppp, then the stock price of the Cyberport Ppp should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cyberport Ppp should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Cyberport: Realisation of an IT Park Through a Public-Private Partnership

References & Further Readings

Ali Farhoomand, Jeroen Van Den Berg (2018), "Cyberport: Realisation of an IT Park Through a Public-Private Partnership Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Us Residential Fund SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Simon Property SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Anicom Holdings Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Tangshan Sanyou SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Sime Darby SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


ETV California MBF II SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Honeywell SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Genesis Emerg Mkts SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Signature Devices SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Argentum 47 SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming