×




In-Vitro Fertilization: Outcomes Measurement Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for In-Vitro Fertilization: Outcomes Measurement case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. In-Vitro Fertilization: Outcomes Measurement case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael E. Porter, Saquib Rahim, Benjamin Tsai. The In-Vitro Fertilization: Outcomes Measurement (referred as “Fertilization Vitro” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of In-Vitro Fertilization: Outcomes Measurement Case Study


As of 2007, there were very few examples of widespread measurement and reporting of health outcomes, a critical quality measure. In-vitro fertilization clinics have been required to report their patient's health outcomes since 1995. The protagonist of the case, Dr. James Goldfarb, faces a number of challenges. As the medical director of a nationally-renowned fertility program at the Cleveland Clinic, he must run an efficient and effective practice that draws patients from both the surrounding area and from around the world. As a leader of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, he must contribute toward the continuing evolution of the practice of in-vitro fertilization and ensure that the outcome measurement system is creating proper incentives and delivering timely, accurate, and useful information to patients, physicians, and researchers.


Case Authors : Michael E. Porter, Saquib Rahim, Benjamin Tsai

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : IT, Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for In-Vitro Fertilization: Outcomes Measurement Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019952) -10019952 - -
Year 1 3469105 -6550847 3469105 0.9434 3272741
Year 2 3962165 -2588682 7431270 0.89 3526313
Year 3 3970955 1382273 11402225 0.8396 3334090
Year 4 3223105 4605378 14625330 0.7921 2553001
TOTAL 14625330 12686145




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2666193

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fertilization Vitro have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fertilization Vitro shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of In-Vitro Fertilization: Outcomes Measurement

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fertilization Vitro often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fertilization Vitro needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019952) -10019952 - -
Year 1 3469105 -6550847 3469105 0.8696 3016613
Year 2 3962165 -2588682 7431270 0.7561 2995966
Year 3 3970955 1382273 11402225 0.6575 2610967
Year 4 3223105 4605378 14625330 0.5718 1842821
TOTAL 10466367


The Net NPV after 4 years is 446415

(10466367 - 10019952 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019952) -10019952 - -
Year 1 3469105 -6550847 3469105 0.8333 2890921
Year 2 3962165 -2588682 7431270 0.6944 2751503
Year 3 3970955 1382273 11402225 0.5787 2298006
Year 4 3223105 4605378 14625330 0.4823 1554352
TOTAL 9494783


The Net NPV after 4 years is -525169

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494783 - 10019952 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fertilization Vitro to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fertilization Vitro has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fertilization Vitro can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fertilization Vitro, then the stock price of the Fertilization Vitro should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fertilization Vitro should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of In-Vitro Fertilization: Outcomes Measurement

References & Further Readings

Michael E. Porter, Saquib Rahim, Benjamin Tsai (2018), "In-Vitro Fertilization: Outcomes Measurement Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Japan Pure Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Uchida Esco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Euro India Fresh SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


H.I.S. Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Personal Services


Triad Group PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Nusantara Pelabuhan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Takahashi Curtain Wall SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


GEA Group AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


KSB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Photronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Vivo Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations