×




Genentech (in 2011): After the Acquisition by Roche Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Genentech (in 2011): After the Acquisition by Roche case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Genentech (in 2011): After the Acquisition by Roche case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Marne L. Arthaud-Day, Frank T. Rothaermel, Wei Zhang. The Genentech (in 2011): After the Acquisition by Roche (referred as “Roche Genentech” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Genentech (in 2011): After the Acquisition by Roche Case Study


Roche had just finished purchasing the last public shares of Genentech in an effort to secure their expertise in biotechnology. However, the recent failure of the colon cancer drug, Avastin, had raised questions about the partnership. Roche's main motives in the acquisition were to gain rights to Avastin and use it for a myriad of other applications. Positive clinical trials would have lead to significantly increased sales and growth into other cancer applications. Instead, the negative results caused Roche shares to drop by 10 percent. The incident raised questions at Roche about the efficiency of drug development at Genentech. Phase III trial failures represented a significant loss of time and money. And, in this case, the FDA revoked Avastin's approval for treatment of breast cancer causing further harm to revenue opportunities for Roche. Now that Roche was in charge, expectations were raised for producing successful Phase III trials that would bring more products to market. But, what was the appropriate resource allocation for early drug discovery and Phase II and III trials? On one side, Genentech wanted to focus on early drug development as a means to keep the future product pipeline well stocked; on the other side, Roche was focused on getting drugs through Phase II and III trials and into the market to generate revenue.


Case Authors : Marne L. Arthaud-Day, Frank T. Rothaermel, Wei Zhang

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Genentech (in 2011): After the Acquisition by Roche Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001497) -10001497 - -
Year 1 3450297 -6551200 3450297 0.9434 3254997
Year 2 3968047 -2583153 7418344 0.89 3531548
Year 3 3956600 1373447 11374944 0.8396 3322038
Year 4 3223394 4596841 14598338 0.7921 2553230
TOTAL 14598338 12661812




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2660315

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Roche Genentech shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Roche Genentech have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Genentech (in 2011): After the Acquisition by Roche

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Roche Genentech often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Roche Genentech needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001497) -10001497 - -
Year 1 3450297 -6551200 3450297 0.8696 3000258
Year 2 3968047 -2583153 7418344 0.7561 3000414
Year 3 3956600 1373447 11374944 0.6575 2601529
Year 4 3223394 4596841 14598338 0.5718 1842986
TOTAL 10445187


The Net NPV after 4 years is 443690

(10445187 - 10001497 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001497) -10001497 - -
Year 1 3450297 -6551200 3450297 0.8333 2875248
Year 2 3968047 -2583153 7418344 0.6944 2755588
Year 3 3956600 1373447 11374944 0.5787 2289699
Year 4 3223394 4596841 14598338 0.4823 1554492
TOTAL 9475026


The Net NPV after 4 years is -526471

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475026 - 10001497 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Roche Genentech to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Roche Genentech has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Roche Genentech can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Roche Genentech, then the stock price of the Roche Genentech should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Roche Genentech should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Genentech (in 2011): After the Acquisition by Roche

References & Further Readings

Marne L. Arthaud-Day, Frank T. Rothaermel, Wei Zhang (2018), "Genentech (in 2011): After the Acquisition by Roche Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Tata Motors SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


PipeHawk SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Revenue Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Xinmin Textile A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Silgans SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Cuentas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Metro Realty SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Suntory Beverage Food SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Nonalcoholic)