×




Health Care Access for All: Making the Dream a Reality Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Health Care Access for All: Making the Dream a Reality case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Health Care Access for All: Making the Dream a Reality case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John A. MacDonald, Anita M. McGahan, Will Mitchell. The Health Care Access for All: Making the Dream a Reality (referred as “Health Care” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Health Care Access for All: Making the Dream a Reality Case Study


For generations, the model for receiving health care services in the developed world has been straightforward. It starts with showing your insurance card at the reception desk and ends with a 10-minute examination/discussion with a doctor. In developing countries, this model is structurally untenable: according to the World Health Organization, there is a global shortage of four million health care providers, and in 57 countries, this amounts to a crisis. The authors present several new models for delivering health care services in developing countries that use ICT (information and communication technologies)-i.e., cell phones, tablets and computers. It is only a matter of time, they say, before these models spread to more resource-rich settings.


Case Authors : John A. MacDonald, Anita M. McGahan, Will Mitchell

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Health Care Access for All: Making the Dream a Reality Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018338) -10018338 - -
Year 1 3455562 -6562776 3455562 0.9434 3259964
Year 2 3958889 -2603887 7414451 0.89 3523397
Year 3 3941619 1337732 11356070 0.8396 3309459
Year 4 3248340 4586072 14604410 0.7921 2572990
TOTAL 14604410 12665810




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647472

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Health Care shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Health Care have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Health Care Access for All: Making the Dream a Reality

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Health Care often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Health Care needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018338) -10018338 - -
Year 1 3455562 -6562776 3455562 0.8696 3004837
Year 2 3958889 -2603887 7414451 0.7561 2993489
Year 3 3941619 1337732 11356070 0.6575 2591678
Year 4 3248340 4586072 14604410 0.5718 1857249
TOTAL 10447253


The Net NPV after 4 years is 428915

(10447253 - 10018338 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018338) -10018338 - -
Year 1 3455562 -6562776 3455562 0.8333 2879635
Year 2 3958889 -2603887 7414451 0.6944 2749228
Year 3 3941619 1337732 11356070 0.5787 2281030
Year 4 3248340 4586072 14604410 0.4823 1566522
TOTAL 9476415


The Net NPV after 4 years is -541923

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9476415 - 10018338 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Health Care to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Health Care has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Health Care can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Health Care, then the stock price of the Health Care should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Health Care should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Health Care Access for All: Making the Dream a Reality

References & Further Readings

John A. MacDonald, Anita M. McGahan, Will Mitchell (2018), "Health Care Access for All: Making the Dream a Reality Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


KC Feed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Anchiano Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Fujian Yuanli Active Carbon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Intica Systems AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Huaying Agri A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Ceres Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Daidoh Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


E.ON SE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Tauriga Sciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Ateme SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Okayama Paper Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products