×




MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Willis Emmons, Michael E. Porter, Spencer Wallace. The MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council (referred as “Massmedic Cluster” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competition, Economic development, Networking, Operations management, Policy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council Case Study


Set in 2004, as Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council (MassMEDIC) President Tom Sommer contemplates the future direction of a successful medical device cluster association. Focuses on the formation of cluster organizations and their roles and effectiveness, highlighting the importance of these organizations in enabling cross-cluster collaboration between firms, universities, regulators and other government officials, and other institutions. Details the events that led to the formation of MassMEDIC and the initial challenges the organization faced. Discusses the evolution of MassMEDIC's activities, from its formation in 1996 through 2004, and the views of different MassMEDIC stakeholders on the future direction of the organization. Provides detailed data about MassMEDIC and the Massachusetts medical device cluster to enable an evaluation of results and inform future direction.


Case Authors : Willis Emmons, Michael E. Porter, Spencer Wallace

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Competition, Economic development, Networking, Operations management, Policy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012444) -10012444 - -
Year 1 3447741 -6564703 3447741 0.9434 3252586
Year 2 3974708 -2589995 7422449 0.89 3537476
Year 3 3967209 1377214 11389658 0.8396 3330945
Year 4 3246241 4623455 14635899 0.7921 2571327
TOTAL 14635899 12692334




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2679890

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Massmedic Cluster have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Massmedic Cluster shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Massmedic Cluster often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Massmedic Cluster needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012444) -10012444 - -
Year 1 3447741 -6564703 3447741 0.8696 2998036
Year 2 3974708 -2589995 7422449 0.7561 3005450
Year 3 3967209 1377214 11389658 0.6575 2608504
Year 4 3246241 4623455 14635899 0.5718 1856049
TOTAL 10468039


The Net NPV after 4 years is 455595

(10468039 - 10012444 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012444) -10012444 - -
Year 1 3447741 -6564703 3447741 0.8333 2873118
Year 2 3974708 -2589995 7422449 0.6944 2760214
Year 3 3967209 1377214 11389658 0.5787 2295839
Year 4 3246241 4623455 14635899 0.4823 1565510
TOTAL 9494680


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517764

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494680 - 10012444 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Massmedic Cluster to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Massmedic Cluster has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Massmedic Cluster can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Massmedic Cluster, then the stock price of the Massmedic Cluster should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Massmedic Cluster should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council

References & Further Readings

Willis Emmons, Michael E. Porter, Spencer Wallace (2018), "MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Oriental Watch SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Six Flags SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


Samyang Optics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Photography


RPA Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Frontera SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Huatai Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Colex Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Vodafone Group PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Kanamic Network SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Rongxin Power Electronic SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Kocom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment