A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: fopen(/var/lib/php/sessions/ci_session56nsao00cq2on8fels3itqvhtp5h6db0): failed to open stream: No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 174


File: /var/www/oakspringuniversity.com/public_html/application/controllers/Frontpage.php
Line: 9
Function: __construct

File: /var/www/oakspringuniversity.com/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Failed to read session data: user (path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 143


File: /var/www/oakspringuniversity.com/public_html/application/controllers/Frontpage.php
Line: 9
Function: __construct

File: /var/www/oakspringuniversity.com/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

NPV: Samsung Electronics' Semiconductor Division (A) Net Present Value Case Analysis

Samsung Electronics' Semiconductor Division (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Samsung Electronics' Semiconductor Division (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Samsung Electronics' Semiconductor Division (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joel Podolny, Sea-Jin Chang. The Samsung Electronics' Semiconductor Division (A) (referred as “Samsung Dram” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Samsung Electronics' Semiconductor Division (A) Case Study

In 2000, Samsung Electronics was the world's largest manufacturer of semiconductor memory chips. Its main line of business was the manufacture of DRAM chips, but worldwide demand had plummeted. Moreover, Intel, the world's largest producer of microprocessors, had formed an alliance with Rambus, a memory design company, to develop a new super-high-speed DRAM design that would represent a new industry standard. Senior management at Samsung faced fundamental strategic issues: Should it continue to invest in the high-risk DRAM business alone, and could Samsung be a market leader by itself? Should it be steadfast in its opposition to the alternative standard, which represented new opportunities? If it adopted the Rambus design, how many resources should be devoted to the manufacture of Rambus chips? Diversification out of the volatile memory business was a key strategic issue and represented one possible means for reducing Samsung's vulnerability to industrywide downturns, but Samsung's past efforts to expand its nonmemory business had met with only limited success. This case provides the background to the issues Samsung faced as it debated how to meet these challenges while remaining a leading player in the semiconductor industry.

Case Authors : Joel Podolny, Sea-Jin Chang

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Risk management

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Samsung Electronics' Semiconductor Division (A) Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017234) -10017234 - -
Year 1 3458624 -6558610 3458624 0.9434 3262853
Year 2 3965690 -2592920 7424314 0.89 3529450
Year 3 3937371 1344451 11361685 0.8396 3305893
Year 4 3232665 4577116 14594350 0.7921 2560573
TOTAL 14594350 12658769

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641535

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Samsung Dram shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Samsung Dram have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Samsung Electronics' Semiconductor Division (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Samsung Dram often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Samsung Dram needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017234) -10017234 - -
Year 1 3458624 -6558610 3458624 0.8696 3007499
Year 2 3965690 -2592920 7424314 0.7561 2998631
Year 3 3937371 1344451 11361685 0.6575 2588885
Year 4 3232665 4577116 14594350 0.5718 1848287
TOTAL 10443303

The Net NPV after 4 years is 426069

(10443303 - 10017234 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017234) -10017234 - -
Year 1 3458624 -6558610 3458624 0.8333 2882187
Year 2 3965690 -2592920 7424314 0.6944 2753951
Year 3 3937371 1344451 11361685 0.5787 2278571
Year 4 3232665 4577116 14594350 0.4823 1558963
TOTAL 9473672

The Net NPV after 4 years is -543562

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473672 - 10017234 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Samsung Dram to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Samsung Dram has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Samsung Dram can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Samsung Dram, then the stock price of the Samsung Dram should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Samsung Dram should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

References & Further Readings

Joel Podolny, Sea-Jin Chang (2018), "Samsung Electronics' Semiconductor Division (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.