×




Expo'98 (A): Ticketing Strategy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Expo'98 (A): Ticketing Strategy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Expo'98 (A): Ticketing Strategy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Julio Cardoso de Menezes, Karel Cool. The Expo'98 (A): Ticketing Strategy (referred as “Expo Expo98” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Expo'98 (A): Ticketing Strategy Case Study


In the Expo98 (A) case, Julio Cardoso, an INSEAD Alumnus, is being asked to design the ticketing strategy for Expo98. He needs to analyse the objectives for the Expo and to decide what pricing strategy will meet these objectives. He can analyse the results from the Vancouver, Brisbane and Seville Expos. But as each one is different, he needs to decide what is the optimal strategy for Portugal. The (B) case gives an overview of the pricing strategy that was chosen and the results of the strategy and the Expo.


Case Authors : Julio Cardoso de Menezes, Karel Cool

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Expo'98 (A): Ticketing Strategy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023732) -10023732 - -
Year 1 3444915 -6578817 3444915 0.9434 3249920
Year 2 3981304 -2597513 7426219 0.89 3543346
Year 3 3956622 1359109 11382841 0.8396 3322056
Year 4 3225795 4584904 14608636 0.7921 2555132
TOTAL 14608636 12670454




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2646722

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Expo Expo98 have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Expo Expo98 shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Expo'98 (A): Ticketing Strategy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Expo Expo98 often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Expo Expo98 needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023732) -10023732 - -
Year 1 3444915 -6578817 3444915 0.8696 2995578
Year 2 3981304 -2597513 7426219 0.7561 3010438
Year 3 3956622 1359109 11382841 0.6575 2601543
Year 4 3225795 4584904 14608636 0.5718 1844359
TOTAL 10451918


The Net NPV after 4 years is 428186

(10451918 - 10023732 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023732) -10023732 - -
Year 1 3444915 -6578817 3444915 0.8333 2870763
Year 2 3981304 -2597513 7426219 0.6944 2764794
Year 3 3956622 1359109 11382841 0.5787 2289712
Year 4 3225795 4584904 14608636 0.4823 1555650
TOTAL 9480918


The Net NPV after 4 years is -542814

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9480918 - 10023732 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Expo Expo98 to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Expo Expo98 has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Expo Expo98 can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Expo Expo98, then the stock price of the Expo Expo98 should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Expo Expo98 should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Expo'98 (A): Ticketing Strategy

References & Further Readings

Julio Cardoso de Menezes, Karel Cool (2018), "Expo'98 (A): Ticketing Strategy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Shinhokoku Steel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


PetroChina ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


GTT Com SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Td Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Nine Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Chu Kong Petroleum and Natural Gas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


China Shipbuilding Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Sanyo Department Store SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)