×




Lotus F1 Team Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Lotus F1 Team case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Lotus F1 Team case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stefan Thomke, Nikolaos Trichakis, Jerome Lenhardt, Daniela Beyersdorfer. The Lotus F1 Team (referred as “F1 Lotus” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economics, Operations management, Research & development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Lotus F1 Team Case Study


Describes the detailed inner workings of a high performance Formula One (F1) racing team. It shows how Lotus F1 Team has been able to battle bigger rivals in a very fast-moving, highly regulated, and ultra-competitive environment, where winning races can come down to split seconds. The case explores all elements a of their high performance system: strategy, innovation, leadership, technology, engineering, and operations. Emphasis is placed on the interplay of these elements and how they confer competitive advantage to teams. Management dilemmas that are explored: retention of high performing individuals, response to disruptive technological changes, and regulatory design in competitive environments.


Case Authors : Stefan Thomke, Nikolaos Trichakis, Jerome Lenhardt, Daniela Beyersdorfer

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Economics, Operations management, Research & development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Lotus F1 Team Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004406) -10004406 - -
Year 1 3445954 -6558452 3445954 0.9434 3250900
Year 2 3970552 -2587900 7416506 0.89 3533777
Year 3 3944139 1356239 11360645 0.8396 3311575
Year 4 3224505 4580744 14585150 0.7921 2554110
TOTAL 14585150 12650362




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2645956

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. F1 Lotus shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of F1 Lotus have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Lotus F1 Team

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at F1 Lotus often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at F1 Lotus needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004406) -10004406 - -
Year 1 3445954 -6558452 3445954 0.8696 2996482
Year 2 3970552 -2587900 7416506 0.7561 3002308
Year 3 3944139 1356239 11360645 0.6575 2593335
Year 4 3224505 4580744 14585150 0.5718 1843621
TOTAL 10435746


The Net NPV after 4 years is 431340

(10435746 - 10004406 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004406) -10004406 - -
Year 1 3445954 -6558452 3445954 0.8333 2871628
Year 2 3970552 -2587900 7416506 0.6944 2757328
Year 3 3944139 1356239 11360645 0.5787 2282488
Year 4 3224505 4580744 14585150 0.4823 1555027
TOTAL 9466471


The Net NPV after 4 years is -537935

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9466471 - 10004406 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of F1 Lotus to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of F1 Lotus has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at F1 Lotus can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at F1 Lotus, then the stock price of the F1 Lotus should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at F1 Lotus should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Lotus F1 Team

References & Further Readings

Stefan Thomke, Nikolaos Trichakis, Jerome Lenhardt, Daniela Beyersdorfer (2018), "Lotus F1 Team Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Guangdong Songfa Ceramics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Subex Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Jadi Imaging SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Office Equipment


Aurea SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Ionis Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Zaoh Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Sanix Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Power Root SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Hosokawa Micron SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods