×




24 Hour Fitness (B): Ownership Changes, 2005-2016 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for 24 Hour Fitness (B): Ownership Changes, 2005-2016 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. 24 Hour Fitness (B): Ownership Changes, 2005-2016 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John R. Wells, Gabriel Ellsworth. The 24 Hour Fitness (B): Ownership Changes, 2005-2016 (referred as “Fitness Hour” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Business history, Business models, Competition, Customers, Demographics, Entrepreneurial finance, Financial analysis, Financial management, Growth strategy, Health, Internet, IT, Labor, Leading teams, Operations management, Organizational structure, Performance measurement, Pricing, Talent management, Workspaces.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of 24 Hour Fitness (B): Ownership Changes, 2005-2016 Case Study


In 2016, 24 Hour Fitness was the number-two fitness chain in the United States, generating revenues of $1.4 billion from 441 clubs serving 3.8 million members. Based in San Ramon, California, 24 Hour Fitness operated clubs in 13 states. Having grown rapidly to become the largest club operator by 2004, the company was sold to a private equity group in 2005 for $1.6 billion. The growth continued until the original founder, Mark Mastrov, left in 2008. Since then, growth had stagnated, and the company lost its leadership position to LA Fitness in 2012. Throughout, 24 Hour Fitness had retained its traditional positioning, offering several club types to satisfy a wide range of customers concentrated in a particular area at affordable prices averaging $39 per month. However, this positioning was increasingly coming under pressure. Small studios offering focused facilities at as little as $10 per month were growing, while LA Fitness provided full-line gyms for an average of $33 per month. Premium clubs also continued to flourish, while the competition from not-for-profits such as university and employee gyms continued unabated. In 2016, the new CEO announced a new strategy to counter these challenges: rebranding 24 Hour as a lifestyle and media company. He declared, "We know we can do great things. We're very excited about the platform that we have to build on." Perhaps this strategy would help restore the company's fortunes.


Case Authors : John R. Wells, Gabriel Ellsworth

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Business history, Business models, Competition, Customers, Demographics, Entrepreneurial finance, Financial analysis, Financial management, Growth strategy, Health, Internet, IT, Labor, Leading teams, Operations management, Organizational structure, Performance measurement, Pricing, Talent management, Workspaces




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for 24 Hour Fitness (B): Ownership Changes, 2005-2016 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005215) -10005215 - -
Year 1 3457926 -6547289 3457926 0.9434 3262194
Year 2 3969774 -2577515 7427700 0.89 3533085
Year 3 3966203 1388688 11393903 0.8396 3330101
Year 4 3224166 4612854 14618069 0.7921 2553841
TOTAL 14618069 12679221




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674006

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fitness Hour shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fitness Hour have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of 24 Hour Fitness (B): Ownership Changes, 2005-2016

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fitness Hour often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fitness Hour needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005215) -10005215 - -
Year 1 3457926 -6547289 3457926 0.8696 3006892
Year 2 3969774 -2577515 7427700 0.7561 3001719
Year 3 3966203 1388688 11393903 0.6575 2607843
Year 4 3224166 4612854 14618069 0.5718 1843427
TOTAL 10459882


The Net NPV after 4 years is 454667

(10459882 - 10005215 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005215) -10005215 - -
Year 1 3457926 -6547289 3457926 0.8333 2881605
Year 2 3969774 -2577515 7427700 0.6944 2756788
Year 3 3966203 1388688 11393903 0.5787 2295256
Year 4 3224166 4612854 14618069 0.4823 1554864
TOTAL 9488513


The Net NPV after 4 years is -516702

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488513 - 10005215 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fitness Hour to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fitness Hour has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fitness Hour can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fitness Hour, then the stock price of the Fitness Hour should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fitness Hour should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of 24 Hour Fitness (B): Ownership Changes, 2005-2016

References & Further Readings

John R. Wells, Gabriel Ellsworth (2018), "24 Hour Fitness (B): Ownership Changes, 2005-2016 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kawasaki Heavy Industries ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


KKR & Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Raysum SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Aruhi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Poh Kong SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Jewelry & Silverware


Fidelity Asian SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Tokushu Tokai Paper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


ICL Israel Chemicals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing