×




Uber and the Sharing Economy: Global Market Expansion and Reception Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Uber and the Sharing Economy: Global Market Expansion and Reception case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Uber and the Sharing Economy: Global Market Expansion and Reception case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Andrew Hoffman. The Uber and the Sharing Economy: Global Market Expansion and Reception (referred as “Uber Cooper” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economy, Emerging markets, Globalization, Internet, IT.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Uber and the Sharing Economy: Global Market Expansion and Reception Case Study


Alexander Cooper is gearing up to lead an expansion strategy for the scrappy and super successful car sharing service, Uber. While the company has not been without its controversy, it is making headway in far off places like India. It is looking to scale its model in India, China, and the rest of Southeast Asia, but is increasingly running into regulatory hurdles. Cooper is forced to think hard about what Uber's expansion strategy should be and how it will impact the company's operations. Uber currently markets itself based on word of mouth, but in markets like China where two companies dominate 99% of market share, this may be unrealistic. What path should this sharing economy company take?


Case Authors : Andrew Hoffman

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Economy, Emerging markets, Globalization, Internet, IT




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Uber and the Sharing Economy: Global Market Expansion and Reception Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021868) -10021868 - -
Year 1 3449350 -6572518 3449350 0.9434 3254104
Year 2 3968157 -2604361 7417507 0.89 3531646
Year 3 3975596 1371235 11393103 0.8396 3337987
Year 4 3231401 4602636 14624504 0.7921 2559572
TOTAL 14624504 12683309




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661441

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Uber Cooper shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Uber Cooper have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Uber and the Sharing Economy: Global Market Expansion and Reception

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Uber Cooper often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Uber Cooper needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021868) -10021868 - -
Year 1 3449350 -6572518 3449350 0.8696 2999435
Year 2 3968157 -2604361 7417507 0.7561 3000497
Year 3 3975596 1371235 11393103 0.6575 2614019
Year 4 3231401 4602636 14624504 0.5718 1847564
TOTAL 10461514


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439646

(10461514 - 10021868 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021868) -10021868 - -
Year 1 3449350 -6572518 3449350 0.8333 2874458
Year 2 3968157 -2604361 7417507 0.6944 2755665
Year 3 3975596 1371235 11393103 0.5787 2300692
Year 4 3231401 4602636 14624504 0.4823 1558353
TOTAL 9489168


The Net NPV after 4 years is -532700

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489168 - 10021868 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Uber Cooper to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Uber Cooper has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Uber Cooper can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Uber Cooper, then the stock price of the Uber Cooper should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Uber Cooper should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Uber and the Sharing Economy: Global Market Expansion and Reception

References & Further Readings

Andrew Hoffman (2018), "Uber and the Sharing Economy: Global Market Expansion and Reception Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Grand Banks Yachts Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Nippon Fine Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Zoo Digital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Lawson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Daechang Solution SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Miko Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Coelba SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


ACC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials