×




Agarwal Packers and Movers: Competing for "Moving" Experiences Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Agarwal Packers and Movers: Competing for "Moving" Experiences case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Agarwal Packers and Movers: Competing for "Moving" Experiences case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Tulsi Jayakumar. The Agarwal Packers and Movers: Competing for "Moving" Experiences (referred as “Apml Movers” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Pricing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Agarwal Packers and Movers: Competing for "Moving" Experiences Case Study


In December 2014, the chairman of Agarwal Packers and Movers Limited (APML) prepared for a meeting with his senior management team. APML was a family-managed business and the largest branded player in the fragmented and largely unorganized house-movers segment of the Indian logistics industry. The company was taking advantage of the Indian economy's growth, government infrastructure spending, and goods and services tax changes that would bring beneficial changes to the industry. While the company had achieved sales of US$62.6 million in 2013/14 and had been lauded for its safety practices and achievements, the industry had low barriers to entry. APML was faced with several large, and numerous small, moving companies that were fighting for business. Moreover, many small companies fraudulently co-opted the company's name to steal customers. APML's chief financial officer had put forth a proposal to increase prices for inter-city relocations. The chairman had to consider the proper price strategy to employ, because any price increase could cost the company customers. Tulsi Jayakumar is affiliated with SP Jain Institute of Management & Research.


Case Authors : Tulsi Jayakumar

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Pricing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Agarwal Packers and Movers: Competing for "Moving" Experiences Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012520) -10012520 - -
Year 1 3462111 -6550409 3462111 0.9434 3266142
Year 2 3982111 -2568298 7444222 0.89 3544065
Year 3 3951268 1382970 11395490 0.8396 3317561
Year 4 3248586 4631556 14644076 0.7921 2573184
TOTAL 14644076 12700952




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2688432

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Apml Movers have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Apml Movers shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Agarwal Packers and Movers: Competing for "Moving" Experiences

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Apml Movers often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Apml Movers needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012520) -10012520 - -
Year 1 3462111 -6550409 3462111 0.8696 3010531
Year 2 3982111 -2568298 7444222 0.7561 3011048
Year 3 3951268 1382970 11395490 0.6575 2598023
Year 4 3248586 4631556 14644076 0.5718 1857390
TOTAL 10476992


The Net NPV after 4 years is 464472

(10476992 - 10012520 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012520) -10012520 - -
Year 1 3462111 -6550409 3462111 0.8333 2885093
Year 2 3982111 -2568298 7444222 0.6944 2765355
Year 3 3951268 1382970 11395490 0.5787 2286613
Year 4 3248586 4631556 14644076 0.4823 1566641
TOTAL 9503701


The Net NPV after 4 years is -508819

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9503701 - 10012520 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Apml Movers to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Apml Movers has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Apml Movers can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Apml Movers, then the stock price of the Apml Movers should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Apml Movers should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Agarwal Packers and Movers: Competing for "Moving" Experiences

References & Further Readings

Tulsi Jayakumar (2018), "Agarwal Packers and Movers: Competing for "Moving" Experiences Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Schoeller-Bleckmann AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Inter Parfums SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Amgen SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Rayonier Advanced Materials SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


OceanFirst SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Nearmap SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Motorola SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Imvest SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Sz Airport A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Heska SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing