×




Uber: An Empire in the Making?, Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Uber: An Empire in the Making?, Spanish Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Uber: An Empire in the Making?, Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Salvatore Cantale, Sarah Hutton. The Uber: An Empire in the Making?, Spanish Version (referred as “Uber Uber's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Strategy, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Uber: An Empire in the Making?, Spanish Version Case Study


The case study is set in early December 2014. Uber has just completed a round of funding and as a result has an eye-watering valuation of US$41 billion. The case initially explains the service Uber offered to its riders and then gives an overview of the origins and early growth of the company, as well as some insights into the influence of co-founder and CEO, Travis Kalanick, on the company culture. The following section outlines the characteristics of the traditional taxi industry, which was initially Uber's primary competitor. Details of Uber's disruptive business model are implicit in the case but the components are not spelled out to the reader. Rather, the intention is to draw this out in small group or plenary discussions through the assignment questions. The case goes on to review more recent growth, outlining some of the PR issues the company has faced with respect to aggressive business practices and questions around its data privacy policies. A possible softening of management's approach is suggested in the final section.


Case Authors : Salvatore Cantale, Sarah Hutton

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Strategy, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Uber: An Empire in the Making?, Spanish Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008806) -10008806 - -
Year 1 3466784 -6542022 3466784 0.9434 3270551
Year 2 3971978 -2570044 7438762 0.89 3535046
Year 3 3943089 1373045 11381851 0.8396 3310694
Year 4 3229668 4602713 14611519 0.7921 2558200
TOTAL 14611519 12674490




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2665684

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Uber Uber's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Uber Uber's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Uber: An Empire in the Making?, Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Uber Uber's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Uber Uber's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008806) -10008806 - -
Year 1 3466784 -6542022 3466784 0.8696 3014595
Year 2 3971978 -2570044 7438762 0.7561 3003386
Year 3 3943089 1373045 11381851 0.6575 2592645
Year 4 3229668 4602713 14611519 0.5718 1846573
TOTAL 10457199


The Net NPV after 4 years is 448393

(10457199 - 10008806 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008806) -10008806 - -
Year 1 3466784 -6542022 3466784 0.8333 2888987
Year 2 3971978 -2570044 7438762 0.6944 2758318
Year 3 3943089 1373045 11381851 0.5787 2281880
Year 4 3229668 4602713 14611519 0.4823 1557517
TOTAL 9486702


The Net NPV after 4 years is -522104

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486702 - 10008806 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Uber Uber's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Uber Uber's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Uber Uber's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Uber Uber's, then the stock price of the Uber Uber's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Uber Uber's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Uber: An Empire in the Making?, Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Salvatore Cantale, Sarah Hutton (2018), "Uber: An Empire in the Making?, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


S.A.S. Dragon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Petronas Chemicals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Outin Futures SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


BGEO Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Sofragi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Tohto Suisan Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Cabot SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Financeira Alfa ORD SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Cybergun SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Serabi Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver