×




Go-Business: Competition in the Newly Deregulated Government Electronic Trading Service Market Hong Kong Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Go-Business: Competition in the Newly Deregulated Government Electronic Trading Service Market Hong Kong case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Go-Business: Competition in the Newly Deregulated Government Electronic Trading Service Market Hong Kong case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Benjamin Yen, Grace Loo. The Go-Business: Competition in the Newly Deregulated Government Electronic Trading Service Market Hong Kong (referred as “Tradelink Trading” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Go-Business: Competition in the Newly Deregulated Government Electronic Trading Service Market Hong Kong Case Study


In 2003, the Hong Kong government opened the market for electronic trading services. It awarded a license, the second of two, to GO-Business to design, implement, operate and maintain the front-end system of the Government Electronic Trading Service (GETS). The first license had gone to Tradelink, which had enjoyed a monopoly in the market for six years. GETS was a system that enabled traders to submit and apply for trade documents electronically. As a latecomer in the market for a compulsory government service that had been monopolized, GO-Business faced formidable barriers in competing with Tradelink. How could GO-Business position itself and what could it do to compete with Tradelink and gained market share?


Case Authors : Benjamin Yen, Grace Loo

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Go-Business: Competition in the Newly Deregulated Government Electronic Trading Service Market Hong Kong Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013897) -10013897 - -
Year 1 3462689 -6551208 3462689 0.9434 3266688
Year 2 3968292 -2582916 7430981 0.89 3531766
Year 3 3968935 1386019 11399916 0.8396 3332394
Year 4 3241531 4627550 14641447 0.7921 2567596
TOTAL 14641447 12698444




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2684547

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tradelink Trading have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tradelink Trading shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Go-Business: Competition in the Newly Deregulated Government Electronic Trading Service Market Hong Kong

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tradelink Trading often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tradelink Trading needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013897) -10013897 - -
Year 1 3462689 -6551208 3462689 0.8696 3011034
Year 2 3968292 -2582916 7430981 0.7561 3000599
Year 3 3968935 1386019 11399916 0.6575 2609639
Year 4 3241531 4627550 14641447 0.5718 1853356
TOTAL 10474628


The Net NPV after 4 years is 460731

(10474628 - 10013897 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013897) -10013897 - -
Year 1 3462689 -6551208 3462689 0.8333 2885574
Year 2 3968292 -2582916 7430981 0.6944 2755758
Year 3 3968935 1386019 11399916 0.5787 2296837
Year 4 3241531 4627550 14641447 0.4823 1563238
TOTAL 9501408


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512489

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501408 - 10013897 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tradelink Trading to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tradelink Trading has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tradelink Trading can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tradelink Trading, then the stock price of the Tradelink Trading should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tradelink Trading should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Go-Business: Competition in the Newly Deregulated Government Electronic Trading Service Market Hong Kong

References & Further Readings

Benjamin Yen, Grace Loo (2018), "Go-Business: Competition in the Newly Deregulated Government Electronic Trading Service Market Hong Kong Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Acco Brands SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Office Supplies


eXtract SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Cegedim SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Surfilter Network Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Burelle SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Epiroc A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Agro Phos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Nexeo Solutions SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Ambika Cotton Mills Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Houlihan Lokey Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Stryker SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies