×




Lung Cheong International: How to Survive in a Changing Business Landscape Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Lung Cheong International: How to Survive in a Changing Business Landscape case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Lung Cheong International: How to Survive in a Changing Business Landscape case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Bennett Yim, Vincent Mak. The Lung Cheong International: How to Survive in a Changing Business Landscape (referred as “Mainland Cheong” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Decision making, International business, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Lung Cheong International: How to Survive in a Changing Business Landscape Case Study


Lung Cheong International Holding Ltd. was founded in 1979 as an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) of toys in Hong Kong. As the mainland Chinese economy took off in the 1980s and 1990s, China became a great hinterland of cheap land and labor for low-tech manufacturing and also a huge and growing consumer market. Lung Cheong continuously felt the challenges of the changing business landscape. Should it move its production lines to the mainland or somewhere with similarly low cost levels? How should it deal with its major western and Japanese customers to maintain good relationships? Should it enter the huge mainland Chinese sales market? If so, how could it compete with mainland-based manufacturers that enjoyed lower production costs and could sell products very cheaply? How could it deal with rampant copyright piracy problems in the mainland market? Or should it focus instead on the West--in particular, the U.S. market?


Case Authors : Bennett Yim, Vincent Mak

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Decision making, International business, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Lung Cheong International: How to Survive in a Changing Business Landscape Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002968) -10002968 - -
Year 1 3445957 -6557011 3445957 0.9434 3250903
Year 2 3954322 -2602689 7400279 0.89 3519333
Year 3 3938646 1335957 11338925 0.8396 3306963
Year 4 3222276 4558233 14561201 0.7921 2552344
TOTAL 14561201 12629543




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2626575

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Mainland Cheong have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Mainland Cheong shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Lung Cheong International: How to Survive in a Changing Business Landscape

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Mainland Cheong often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Mainland Cheong needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002968) -10002968 - -
Year 1 3445957 -6557011 3445957 0.8696 2996484
Year 2 3954322 -2602689 7400279 0.7561 2990036
Year 3 3938646 1335957 11338925 0.6575 2589724
Year 4 3222276 4558233 14561201 0.5718 1842347
TOTAL 10418590


The Net NPV after 4 years is 415622

(10418590 - 10002968 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002968) -10002968 - -
Year 1 3445957 -6557011 3445957 0.8333 2871631
Year 2 3954322 -2602689 7400279 0.6944 2746057
Year 3 3938646 1335957 11338925 0.5787 2279309
Year 4 3222276 4558233 14561201 0.4823 1553953
TOTAL 9450949


The Net NPV after 4 years is -552019

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9450949 - 10002968 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Mainland Cheong to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Mainland Cheong has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Mainland Cheong can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Mainland Cheong, then the stock price of the Mainland Cheong should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Mainland Cheong should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Lung Cheong International: How to Survive in a Changing Business Landscape

References & Further Readings

Bennett Yim, Vincent Mak (2018), "Lung Cheong International: How to Survive in a Changing Business Landscape Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Acencia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


United Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


SAF Holland SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Cosmo Films Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


MCJ SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Hardware


Petratherm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Hanil Forging Industrial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Yuneng Holding A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Medasys SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Netflix SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV


Prologue SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


TTA Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment