×




AOL's Acquisition of Mirabilis (A): Accounting for Acquired In-Process R&D Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for AOL's Acquisition of Mirabilis (A): Accounting for Acquired In-Process R&D case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. AOL's Acquisition of Mirabilis (A): Accounting for Acquired In-Process R&D case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mary E. Barth, David W. Hoyt. The AOL's Acquisition of Mirabilis (A): Accounting for Acquired In-Process R&D (referred as “Iprd Accounting” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Government, Internet, IT, Mergers & acquisitions, Research & development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of AOL's Acquisition of Mirabilis (A): Accounting for Acquired In-Process R&D Case Study


Explores the issues of accounting for in-process research and development (IPRD) for an acquisition under purchase-method accounting. Provides information on acquisition accounting and the standards used for defining and treating IPRD. Also discusses practices that led to controversy over IPRD accounting in the mid-1990s. The situation is the acquisition of a small software company (Mirabilis) with a very popular Internet software product for instant messaging, but with no revenues. The acquiring company, America Online, indicated in the acquisition announcement that it intended to write off a substantial amount of the purchase price as IPRD. Shortly after that announcement, the new chief accountant of the SEC indicated that the SEC was concerned about the amount of such write-offs. Asks how the CFO of AOL should respond and what the impact of the IPRD write-off amount will be on the company's future earnings and stock price.


Case Authors : Mary E. Barth, David W. Hoyt

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Government, Internet, IT, Mergers & acquisitions, Research & development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for AOL's Acquisition of Mirabilis (A): Accounting for Acquired In-Process R&D Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005592) -10005592 - -
Year 1 3469860 -6535732 3469860 0.9434 3273453
Year 2 3959024 -2576708 7428884 0.89 3523517
Year 3 3948845 1372137 11377729 0.8396 3315526
Year 4 3225523 4597660 14603252 0.7921 2554916
TOTAL 14603252 12667413




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661821

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Iprd Accounting shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Iprd Accounting have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of AOL's Acquisition of Mirabilis (A): Accounting for Acquired In-Process R&D

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Iprd Accounting often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Iprd Accounting needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005592) -10005592 - -
Year 1 3469860 -6535732 3469860 0.8696 3017270
Year 2 3959024 -2576708 7428884 0.7561 2993591
Year 3 3948845 1372137 11377729 0.6575 2596430
Year 4 3225523 4597660 14603252 0.5718 1844203
TOTAL 10451493


The Net NPV after 4 years is 445901

(10451493 - 10005592 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005592) -10005592 - -
Year 1 3469860 -6535732 3469860 0.8333 2891550
Year 2 3959024 -2576708 7428884 0.6944 2749322
Year 3 3948845 1372137 11377729 0.5787 2285211
Year 4 3225523 4597660 14603252 0.4823 1555518
TOTAL 9481602


The Net NPV after 4 years is -523990

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481602 - 10005592 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Iprd Accounting to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Iprd Accounting has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Iprd Accounting can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Iprd Accounting, then the stock price of the Iprd Accounting should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Iprd Accounting should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of AOL's Acquisition of Mirabilis (A): Accounting for Acquired In-Process R&D

References & Further Readings

Mary E. Barth, David W. Hoyt (2018), "AOL's Acquisition of Mirabilis (A): Accounting for Acquired In-Process R&D Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Samhwa Crown SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


AZOOM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Endo Lighting Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Alco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Ornapaper Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


UniTest SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Scientific Learning SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Shindaeyang Pa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


PCCW SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Kingsway Financial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)