×




Strategy Execution Module 8: Linking Performance to Markets Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Strategy Execution Module 8: Linking Performance to Markets case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Strategy Execution Module 8: Linking Performance to Markets case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert L. Simons. The Strategy Execution Module 8: Linking Performance to Markets (referred as “Module Markets” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate governance, Costs, Pricing, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Strategy Execution Module 8: Linking Performance to Markets Case Study


This module reading shows how to link profit plans and other performance measurement systems to both internal and external markets. Starting with the transfer of goods and services within a firm, the module discusses the different methods of designing transfer pricing systems, the effects of these methods on the profitability of the divisions involved, and explains the trade-offs among transfer pricing policies. Next, the module focuses on the linkage between internal business operations and external markets including capital markets, customer markets, and supplier markets. The discussion illustrates how managers use accounting-based tools such as profit plans, ROE measures, and residual income measures such as EVA to communicate with these markets. While this module is designed to be used alone, it is part of the Strategy Execution series. Taken together, the series forms a complete course that teaches the latest techniques for using performance measurement and control systems to implement strategy. Modules 1 - 4 set out the foundations for strategy implementation. Modules 5 - 10 teach quantitative tools for performance measurement and control. Modules 11 - 15 illustrate the use of these techniques by managers to achieve profit goals and strategies. View the full Strategy Execution series at: hbsp.harvard.edu/strategyexecution.


Case Authors : Robert L. Simons

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Corporate governance, Costs, Pricing, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Strategy Execution Module 8: Linking Performance to Markets Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011474) -10011474 - -
Year 1 3446330 -6565144 3446330 0.9434 3251255
Year 2 3966857 -2598287 7413187 0.89 3530489
Year 3 3944914 1346627 11358101 0.8396 3312226
Year 4 3228548 4575175 14586649 0.7921 2557312
TOTAL 14586649 12651282




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2639808

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Module Markets have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Module Markets shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Strategy Execution Module 8: Linking Performance to Markets

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Module Markets often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Module Markets needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011474) -10011474 - -
Year 1 3446330 -6565144 3446330 0.8696 2996809
Year 2 3966857 -2598287 7413187 0.7561 2999514
Year 3 3944914 1346627 11358101 0.6575 2593845
Year 4 3228548 4575175 14586649 0.5718 1845933
TOTAL 10436100


The Net NPV after 4 years is 424626

(10436100 - 10011474 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011474) -10011474 - -
Year 1 3446330 -6565144 3446330 0.8333 2871942
Year 2 3966857 -2598287 7413187 0.6944 2754762
Year 3 3944914 1346627 11358101 0.5787 2282936
Year 4 3228548 4575175 14586649 0.4823 1556977
TOTAL 9466617


The Net NPV after 4 years is -544857

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9466617 - 10011474 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Module Markets to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Module Markets has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Module Markets can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Module Markets, then the stock price of the Module Markets should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Module Markets should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Strategy Execution Module 8: Linking Performance to Markets

References & Further Readings

Robert L. Simons (2018), "Strategy Execution Module 8: Linking Performance to Markets Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Guoxing Rongda A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Clough Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Fortive SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


On Time Logistics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Greenwood Sejahtera SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Hella KGaA Hueck & Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Nichiwa Sangyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing