×




Sharp Corp.: Technology Strategy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Sharp Corp.: Technology Strategy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Sharp Corp.: Technology Strategy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David J. Collis, Tsutomu Noda. The Sharp Corp.: Technology Strategy (referred as “Sharp Technologies” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Developing employees, Innovation, Leadership, Risk management, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Sharp Corp.: Technology Strategy Case Study


Teaches the evolution of the corporate strategy of Sharp Corp., Japan. Sharp Corp., a second-tier assembler of TV sets and home appliances, gradually and consistently improved performance by developing expertise in electronic device technologies such as specialized ICs and LCDs and used these technologies to develop innovative end products. As a result, the company was regarded as a world leader in opto-electronics and was becoming a premier comprehensive electronics company. Teaching Objectives: Explores how the company identified, developed, and leveraged its lay technologies. Also discusses how the company coordinated across multiple businesses, and its organizational capabilities.


Case Authors : David J. Collis, Tsutomu Noda

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Developing employees, Innovation, Leadership, Risk management, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Sharp Corp.: Technology Strategy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021159) -10021159 - -
Year 1 3458668 -6562491 3458668 0.9434 3262894
Year 2 3979287 -2583204 7437955 0.89 3541551
Year 3 3971895 1388691 11409850 0.8396 3334880
Year 4 3247160 4635851 14657010 0.7921 2572055
TOTAL 14657010 12711380




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2690221

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Sharp Technologies have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Sharp Technologies shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Sharp Corp.: Technology Strategy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Sharp Technologies often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Sharp Technologies needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021159) -10021159 - -
Year 1 3458668 -6562491 3458668 0.8696 3007537
Year 2 3979287 -2583204 7437955 0.7561 3008913
Year 3 3971895 1388691 11409850 0.6575 2611585
Year 4 3247160 4635851 14657010 0.5718 1856574
TOTAL 10484610


The Net NPV after 4 years is 463451

(10484610 - 10021159 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021159) -10021159 - -
Year 1 3458668 -6562491 3458668 0.8333 2882223
Year 2 3979287 -2583204 7437955 0.6944 2763394
Year 3 3971895 1388691 11409850 0.5787 2298550
Year 4 3247160 4635851 14657010 0.4823 1565953
TOTAL 9510120


The Net NPV after 4 years is -511039

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9510120 - 10021159 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Sharp Technologies to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Sharp Technologies has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Sharp Technologies can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Sharp Technologies, then the stock price of the Sharp Technologies should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Sharp Technologies should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Sharp Corp.: Technology Strategy

References & Further Readings

David J. Collis, Tsutomu Noda (2018), "Sharp Corp.: Technology Strategy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Neon Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Yondoshi Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Jewelry & Silverware


Fox Marble SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Ennis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Office Supplies


Fuji Oil Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


M&C Life Science SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Spice Mobility Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Nighthawk Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Nippon Chemi-Con Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


FIBI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Money Center Banks


Street Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Nsx Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services