×




Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Henry Mintzberg. The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies (referred as “Definitions Ii” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies Case Study


Strategy requires multiple definitions to fully appreciate its implications. Accordingly, this article proposes five definitions--strategy as plan, ploy, pattern, position, and perspective--and analyzes how these definitions interrelate. Part II reconsiders the question of why organizations really do need strategies, and also shows how some long-held beliefs explain why organizations don't, as well as do, need strategies. It considers the needs for strategy to set direction, focus effort, define the organization, and provide consistency.


Case Authors : Henry Mintzberg

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003557) -10003557 - -
Year 1 3444331 -6559226 3444331 0.9434 3249369
Year 2 3969090 -2590136 7413421 0.89 3532476
Year 3 3974231 1384095 11387652 0.8396 3336841
Year 4 3246530 4630625 14634182 0.7921 2571556
TOTAL 14634182 12690242




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2686685

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Definitions Ii have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Definitions Ii shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Definitions Ii often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Definitions Ii needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003557) -10003557 - -
Year 1 3444331 -6559226 3444331 0.8696 2995070
Year 2 3969090 -2590136 7413421 0.7561 3001202
Year 3 3974231 1384095 11387652 0.6575 2613121
Year 4 3246530 4630625 14634182 0.5718 1856214
TOTAL 10465608


The Net NPV after 4 years is 462051

(10465608 - 10003557 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003557) -10003557 - -
Year 1 3444331 -6559226 3444331 0.8333 2870276
Year 2 3969090 -2590136 7413421 0.6944 2756313
Year 3 3974231 1384095 11387652 0.5787 2299902
Year 4 3246530 4630625 14634182 0.4823 1565649
TOTAL 9492140


The Net NPV after 4 years is -511417

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492140 - 10003557 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Definitions Ii to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Definitions Ii has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Definitions Ii can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Definitions Ii, then the stock price of the Definitions Ii should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Definitions Ii should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies

References & Further Readings

Henry Mintzberg (2018), "Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Spirax Sarco Engineering Plc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Legrand SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Shizuoka Gas Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Kin-Ei SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


Beach Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Shenzhen Seg A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Technology)


Wiscom Sys A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Soulbrain SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Mizuho Medy Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Foy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Zhong Fu Tong SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services