×




Judo Economics, Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Judo Economics, Spanish Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Judo Economics, Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Adam Brandenburger, Julia Kou. The Judo Economics, Spanish Version (referred as “Fares Entrants” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Currency, Entrepreneurship, Manufacturing, Marketing, Pricing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Judo Economics, Spanish Version Case Study


The early 1990s saw a new wave of start-ups in the U.S. airline business. One entrant, Kiwi International Air Lines, took to the skies in September 1992 with a strategy of attracting small-business travelers looking to save money but lacking the flexibility to book in advance. Fares were to be pegged to the lowest restricted fares in the market, but offered on an unrestricted basis. Another setting in which entrants have recently sought to capture market share from large, established players is the U.S. credit card industry. In the early 1990s, the industry witnessed an onslaught of new players wooing customers with offers of low interest rates and small or nonexistent fees. This case explores some aspects of the game between small-scale entrants and large-scale incumbents.


Case Authors : Adam Brandenburger, Julia Kou

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Currency, Entrepreneurship, Manufacturing, Marketing, Pricing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Judo Economics, Spanish Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023934) -10023934 - -
Year 1 3448104 -6575830 3448104 0.9434 3252928
Year 2 3982316 -2593514 7430420 0.89 3544247
Year 3 3941431 1347917 11371851 0.8396 3309301
Year 4 3233993 4581910 14605844 0.7921 2561625
TOTAL 14605844 12668102




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2644168

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fares Entrants shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fares Entrants have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Judo Economics, Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fares Entrants often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fares Entrants needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023934) -10023934 - -
Year 1 3448104 -6575830 3448104 0.8696 2998351
Year 2 3982316 -2593514 7430420 0.7561 3011203
Year 3 3941431 1347917 11371851 0.6575 2591555
Year 4 3233993 4581910 14605844 0.5718 1849046
TOTAL 10450155


The Net NPV after 4 years is 426221

(10450155 - 10023934 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023934) -10023934 - -
Year 1 3448104 -6575830 3448104 0.8333 2873420
Year 2 3982316 -2593514 7430420 0.6944 2765497
Year 3 3941431 1347917 11371851 0.5787 2280921
Year 4 3233993 4581910 14605844 0.4823 1559603
TOTAL 9479441


The Net NPV after 4 years is -544493

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9479441 - 10023934 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fares Entrants to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fares Entrants has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fares Entrants can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fares Entrants, then the stock price of the Fares Entrants should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fares Entrants should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Judo Economics, Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Adam Brandenburger, Julia Kou (2018), "Judo Economics, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


PZU SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


China Statenstruction Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Stonecastle SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Avocet Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Halma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Great Lakes Dredge&Dock SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


OI PN SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


RIX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods