×




Singapore Airlines: Global Challenges Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Singapore Airlines: Global Challenges case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Singapore Airlines: Global Challenges case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Bruce McKern, Margot Sutherland. The Singapore Airlines: Global Challenges (referred as “Airline's Choong” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization, Joint ventures.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Singapore Airlines: Global Challenges Case Study


In March 2002, Singapore Airlines (SIA), recognized internationally for quality, profitability, and management, was facing difficult operating conditions. Dr. Cheong Choong Kong, deputy chairman and CEO, considered how he and his management committee would respond to the forces of globalization, regulatory adjustment, and the impact of terrorist attacks in America on the airline and the industry. Their challenge: to position the airline for continued growth in a globalizing industry while maintaining the airline's loss-free record. The airline's continuing challenges would stretch SIA's people far beyond the demands of its previous history. Was the company's strategy right for the more turbulent times ahead, and was the organization durable and flexible enough to ensure its success?


Case Authors : Bruce McKern, Margot Sutherland

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Globalization, Joint ventures




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Singapore Airlines: Global Challenges Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028910) -10028910 - -
Year 1 3466824 -6562086 3466824 0.9434 3270589
Year 2 3962652 -2599434 7429476 0.89 3526746
Year 3 3963669 1364235 11393145 0.8396 3327973
Year 4 3249732 4613967 14642877 0.7921 2574092
TOTAL 14642877 12699400




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670490

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Airline's Choong have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Airline's Choong shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Singapore Airlines: Global Challenges

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Airline's Choong often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Airline's Choong needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028910) -10028910 - -
Year 1 3466824 -6562086 3466824 0.8696 3014630
Year 2 3962652 -2599434 7429476 0.7561 2996334
Year 3 3963669 1364235 11393145 0.6575 2606177
Year 4 3249732 4613967 14642877 0.5718 1858045
TOTAL 10475185


The Net NPV after 4 years is 446275

(10475185 - 10028910 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028910) -10028910 - -
Year 1 3466824 -6562086 3466824 0.8333 2889020
Year 2 3962652 -2599434 7429476 0.6944 2751842
Year 3 3963669 1364235 11393145 0.5787 2293790
Year 4 3249732 4613967 14642877 0.4823 1567193
TOTAL 9501845


The Net NPV after 4 years is -527065

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501845 - 10028910 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Airline's Choong to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Airline's Choong has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Airline's Choong can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Airline's Choong, then the stock price of the Airline's Choong should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Airline's Choong should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Singapore Airlines: Global Challenges

References & Further Readings

Bruce McKern, Margot Sutherland (2018), "Singapore Airlines: Global Challenges Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Sportech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


Sala Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Cytokinetics Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Changchai A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Lamtex Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Kaufman Et Broad SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


StarTek SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Takeuchi Mfg Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery