×




XiamenAir in 2014: The Dreamliner Decision Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for XiamenAir in 2014: The Dreamliner Decision case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. XiamenAir in 2014: The Dreamliner Decision case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by W. Glenn Rowe, Xiaomei Guo. The XiamenAir in 2014: The Dreamliner Decision (referred as “Xiamenair Dreamliner” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of XiamenAir in 2014: The Dreamliner Decision Case Study


In spring 2014, XiamenAir is the most profitable of the five largest airlines in China. With bases in Xiamen, Fuzhou and Hangzhou, its flight network covers major cities in China with international service to Macao, Taiwan, Hong Kong and other Southeast Asian countries. The company prides itself on its differentiation strategy: customer service, building a brand and reputation that its customers trust and providing a service for which its customers are willing to pay a premium price even when there are low cost/low price carriers available. Its management is contemplating buying six new Boeing Dreamliner wide-body aircraft that will allow the company to expand its market to Europe, Australia and western North America. Will this purchase enable Fujian Province to more quickly become established as the regional hub for Southeast Asia, Northeast Asia and cross-strait transportation? Will it help speed China's push to internationalize its passenger airlines? In the face of growing competition from high-speed rail networks and both Chinese and international airlines, the management must decide how best to grow the company and maintain its profits.


Case Authors : W. Glenn Rowe, Xiaomei Guo

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for XiamenAir in 2014: The Dreamliner Decision Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012403) -10012403 - -
Year 1 3472880 -6539523 3472880 0.9434 3276302
Year 2 3972119 -2567404 7444999 0.89 3535172
Year 3 3952262 1384858 11397261 0.8396 3318395
Year 4 3250364 4635222 14647625 0.7921 2574593
TOTAL 14647625 12704462




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2692059

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Xiamenair Dreamliner have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Xiamenair Dreamliner shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of XiamenAir in 2014: The Dreamliner Decision

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Xiamenair Dreamliner often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Xiamenair Dreamliner needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012403) -10012403 - -
Year 1 3472880 -6539523 3472880 0.8696 3019896
Year 2 3972119 -2567404 7444999 0.7561 3003493
Year 3 3952262 1384858 11397261 0.6575 2598676
Year 4 3250364 4635222 14647625 0.5718 1858406
TOTAL 10480471


The Net NPV after 4 years is 468068

(10480471 - 10012403 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012403) -10012403 - -
Year 1 3472880 -6539523 3472880 0.8333 2894067
Year 2 3972119 -2567404 7444999 0.6944 2758416
Year 3 3952262 1384858 11397261 0.5787 2287189
Year 4 3250364 4635222 14647625 0.4823 1567498
TOTAL 9507169


The Net NPV after 4 years is -505234

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9507169 - 10012403 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Xiamenair Dreamliner to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Xiamenair Dreamliner has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Xiamenair Dreamliner can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Xiamenair Dreamliner, then the stock price of the Xiamenair Dreamliner should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Xiamenair Dreamliner should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of XiamenAir in 2014: The Dreamliner Decision

References & Further Readings

W. Glenn Rowe, Xiaomei Guo (2018), "XiamenAir in 2014: The Dreamliner Decision Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


CCM Duopharma Biotech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Regent Pacific SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Kodensha SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Kimura SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Home Improvement)


Mecelec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


QUALICORP ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Guangdong Failong Crystal Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Deleum SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


AGL Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities