×




Esterline Technologies: Lean Manufacturing Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Esterline Technologies: Lean Manufacturing case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Esterline Technologies: Lean Manufacturing case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Richard L. Nolan, Karen A Brown, Subodha Kumar. The Esterline Technologies: Lean Manufacturing (referred as “Lean Esterline” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Manufacturing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Esterline Technologies: Lean Manufacturing Case Study


Robert CreminRaises the issue of the appropriate role of IT in lean manufacturing. Most large manufacturing companies have implemented ERP IT systems to support lean manufacturing practices. The Kerry plant of Esterline Technologies attempted an ERP implementation and then terminated it. Now the Kerry plant is revisiting the appropriate use of IT in an environment of highly innovative lean manufacturing.


Case Authors : Richard L. Nolan, Karen A Brown, Subodha Kumar

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : IT, Manufacturing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Esterline Technologies: Lean Manufacturing Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023046) -10023046 - -
Year 1 3470640 -6552406 3470640 0.9434 3274189
Year 2 3980063 -2572343 7450703 0.89 3542242
Year 3 3943252 1370909 11393955 0.8396 3310830
Year 4 3229053 4599962 14623008 0.7921 2557712
TOTAL 14623008 12684973




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661927

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Lean Esterline have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Lean Esterline shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Esterline Technologies: Lean Manufacturing

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Lean Esterline often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Lean Esterline needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023046) -10023046 - -
Year 1 3470640 -6552406 3470640 0.8696 3017948
Year 2 3980063 -2572343 7450703 0.7561 3009499
Year 3 3943252 1370909 11393955 0.6575 2592752
Year 4 3229053 4599962 14623008 0.5718 1846222
TOTAL 10466421


The Net NPV after 4 years is 443375

(10466421 - 10023046 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023046) -10023046 - -
Year 1 3470640 -6552406 3470640 0.8333 2892200
Year 2 3980063 -2572343 7450703 0.6944 2763933
Year 3 3943252 1370909 11393955 0.5787 2281975
Year 4 3229053 4599962 14623008 0.4823 1557221
TOTAL 9495328


The Net NPV after 4 years is -527718

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495328 - 10023046 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Lean Esterline to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Lean Esterline has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Lean Esterline can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Lean Esterline, then the stock price of the Lean Esterline should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Lean Esterline should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Esterline Technologies: Lean Manufacturing

References & Further Readings

Richard L. Nolan, Karen A Brown, Subodha Kumar (2018), "Esterline Technologies: Lean Manufacturing Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Manfield Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Avic Electro A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


NCC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Petronas Gas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Yinda Infocomm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Clear Leisure SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Rio Tinto PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining