×




Spir-it, Inc. (A): Building the Business Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Spir-it, Inc. (A): Building the Business case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Spir-it, Inc. (A): Building the Business case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Steven J. Spear. The Spir-it, Inc. (A): Building the Business (referred as “Sindler Rubber” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy, Human resource management, Manufacturing, Marketing, Product development, Succession planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Spir-it, Inc. (A): Building the Business Case Study


Early in February 1934, two and a half months after the end of prohibition, Jack Sindler sat with a friend in Boston's Ritz Hotel bar enjoying a drink. Sindler worked for the Converse Rubber Co., and he was always inventing something. He held several patents for rubber products and processes, and he had already filed patents in the area of thermoplastics, where new compounds were just being developed. While enjoying his martini, Sindler tried to grab the olive using his fingers. It was then that he hit on the idea of a harpoon-like barbed spear to make the retrieval easier. With this eureka invention of the swizzle stick, Sindler took the first steps toward creating a company that would grow to employment of 200 and revenues of $12 million by the turn of the century. This case details many of the twists and turns that Sindler and his successors faced, including introduction of new products and processes, entry into new markets, acquisitions, and managerial succession. Presents a history of a company, showing much of the complexity that its general managers faced.


Case Authors : Steven J. Spear

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy, Human resource management, Manufacturing, Marketing, Product development, Succession planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Spir-it, Inc. (A): Building the Business Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006657) -10006657 - -
Year 1 3462392 -6544265 3462392 0.9434 3266408
Year 2 3974414 -2569851 7436806 0.89 3537214
Year 3 3959131 1389280 11395937 0.8396 3324163
Year 4 3236690 4625970 14632627 0.7921 2563762
TOTAL 14632627 12691546




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2684889

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Sindler Rubber have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Sindler Rubber shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Spir-it, Inc. (A): Building the Business

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Sindler Rubber often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Sindler Rubber needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006657) -10006657 - -
Year 1 3462392 -6544265 3462392 0.8696 3010776
Year 2 3974414 -2569851 7436806 0.7561 3005228
Year 3 3959131 1389280 11395937 0.6575 2603193
Year 4 3236690 4625970 14632627 0.5718 1850588
TOTAL 10469785


The Net NPV after 4 years is 463128

(10469785 - 10006657 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006657) -10006657 - -
Year 1 3462392 -6544265 3462392 0.8333 2885327
Year 2 3974414 -2569851 7436806 0.6944 2760010
Year 3 3959131 1389280 11395937 0.5787 2291164
Year 4 3236690 4625970 14632627 0.4823 1560904
TOTAL 9497404


The Net NPV after 4 years is -509253

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497404 - 10006657 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Sindler Rubber to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Sindler Rubber has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Sindler Rubber can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Sindler Rubber, then the stock price of the Sindler Rubber should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Sindler Rubber should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Spir-it, Inc. (A): Building the Business

References & Further Readings

Steven J. Spear (2018), "Spir-it, Inc. (A): Building the Business Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


I-On Communications SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


BSD Crown SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Gome Finance Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


SG Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


FedEx SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Air Courier


Jyske Bank SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Western Energy Svcs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Sumitomo Riko SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Caspian Sunrise SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations