×




Pearson's Successmaker: Putting the Customer First in Transforming Product Development Processes Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Pearson's Successmaker: Putting the Customer First in Transforming Product Development Processes case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Pearson's Successmaker: Putting the Customer First in Transforming Product Development Processes case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by T.S. Raghu, Collin Sellman. The Pearson's Successmaker: Putting the Customer First in Transforming Product Development Processes (referred as “Education Agile” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Marketing, Operations management, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Pearson's Successmaker: Putting the Customer First in Transforming Product Development Processes Case Study


Pearson Plc is an education company that operates worldwide and is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom. Its six primary business units are North American Education, International Education, Professional, the Financial Times, Interactive Data, and Penguin Publishing. The vice-president of product management within the Digital Learning division of the North American Education unit based in Chandler, Arizona begins to transform the product development processes to better meet the needs of his customers in the education market, specifically in transitioning from using an off-shored waterfall software development model to an on-shore Agile model. When the vice-president first joined Pearson a year earlier, the Digital Learning unit had spent significant resources developing a major upgrade to one of its educational software products. The first version of this new product was challenged by the disconnect between what the software development group was delivering and what the vice-president's customers desired. He is faced with a decision to continue focusing on the specific methodology they had implemented (Scrum) or move to a new one (Kanban). Additionally, he has to consider expanding his focus to help drive Agile methodologies both with other groups in his business unit and outside his business unit. These decisions must be made at a potentially critical time for his products as his organization deals with the growing pains associated with the shift to Agile.


Case Authors : T.S. Raghu, Collin Sellman

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : IT, Marketing, Operations management, Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Pearson's Successmaker: Putting the Customer First in Transforming Product Development Processes Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024242) -10024242 - -
Year 1 3462842 -6561400 3462842 0.9434 3266832
Year 2 3954427 -2606973 7417269 0.89 3519426
Year 3 3950918 1343945 11368187 0.8396 3317267
Year 4 3235031 4578976 14603218 0.7921 2562448
TOTAL 14603218 12665973




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641731

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Education Agile shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Education Agile have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Pearson's Successmaker: Putting the Customer First in Transforming Product Development Processes

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Education Agile often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Education Agile needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024242) -10024242 - -
Year 1 3462842 -6561400 3462842 0.8696 3011167
Year 2 3954427 -2606973 7417269 0.7561 2990115
Year 3 3950918 1343945 11368187 0.6575 2597793
Year 4 3235031 4578976 14603218 0.5718 1849639
TOTAL 10448714


The Net NPV after 4 years is 424472

(10448714 - 10024242 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024242) -10024242 - -
Year 1 3462842 -6561400 3462842 0.8333 2885702
Year 2 3954427 -2606973 7417269 0.6944 2746130
Year 3 3950918 1343945 11368187 0.5787 2286411
Year 4 3235031 4578976 14603218 0.4823 1560104
TOTAL 9478346


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545896

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9478346 - 10024242 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Education Agile to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Education Agile has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Education Agile can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Education Agile, then the stock price of the Education Agile should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Education Agile should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Pearson's Successmaker: Putting the Customer First in Transforming Product Development Processes

References & Further Readings

T.S. Raghu, Collin Sellman (2018), "Pearson's Successmaker: Putting the Customer First in Transforming Product Development Processes Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Shin Nippon Biomed Lab SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


LCNB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Motif Bio PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Mitrajaya SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Nila Infrastructures Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Euromoney SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Automobile &Pc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Mudanjiang Hengfeng SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Goldman Sachs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Wan Kei SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Cahya Mata Sarawak SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials