×




Toronto Sun and Caribana Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Toronto Sun and Caribana case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Toronto Sun and Caribana case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Kenneth J. Klassen, Leanne Miele. The Toronto Sun and Caribana (referred as “Parade Toronto” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Project management, Time management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Toronto Sun and Caribana Case Study


It was June 5, 2008 and the senior promotions coordinator was beginning to feel the pressure of managing a major sponsorship event for the Toronto Sun, a daily newspaper publication in Ontario, Canada. She had recently been hired and had received the responsibility of organizing the Toronto Sun's presence in the city's annual Caribana Parade after her colleague failed to make any progress following months of handling the assignment. With only eight weeks until parade day (August 2), she felt challenged to make the company's float a success. The Toronto Sun earned its place in the parade as the primary print media sponsor for the event. Pulling the company's float from the biggest parade event in the city would mean forfeiting valuable marketing exposure. This case was designed for use in an undergraduate or MBA operations management or introductory project management course. Developed to aid instructors in facilitating discussions of key project management concepts, the case content allows for an analytical approach to covering the basic skills in planning a project, including precedence relationships, critical path, due dates, uncertainty (PERT tasks), crashing, etc. It can be used to teach students MS Project or other project management software. It can also be used for a less analytic, more managerial discussion of project management.


Case Authors : Kenneth J. Klassen, Leanne Miele

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Project management, Time management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Toronto Sun and Caribana Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024562) -10024562 - -
Year 1 3453960 -6570602 3453960 0.9434 3258453
Year 2 3965132 -2605470 7419092 0.89 3528953
Year 3 3938049 1332579 11357141 0.8396 3306462
Year 4 3242513 4575092 14599654 0.7921 2568374
TOTAL 14599654 12662242




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2637680

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Parade Toronto have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Parade Toronto shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Toronto Sun and Caribana

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Parade Toronto often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Parade Toronto needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024562) -10024562 - -
Year 1 3453960 -6570602 3453960 0.8696 3003443
Year 2 3965132 -2605470 7419092 0.7561 2998209
Year 3 3938049 1332579 11357141 0.6575 2589331
Year 4 3242513 4575092 14599654 0.5718 1853917
TOTAL 10444901


The Net NPV after 4 years is 420339

(10444901 - 10024562 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024562) -10024562 - -
Year 1 3453960 -6570602 3453960 0.8333 2878300
Year 2 3965132 -2605470 7419092 0.6944 2753564
Year 3 3938049 1332579 11357141 0.5787 2278964
Year 4 3242513 4575092 14599654 0.4823 1563712
TOTAL 9474539


The Net NPV after 4 years is -550023

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9474539 - 10024562 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Parade Toronto to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Parade Toronto has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Parade Toronto can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Parade Toronto, then the stock price of the Parade Toronto should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Parade Toronto should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Toronto Sun and Caribana

References & Further Readings

Kenneth J. Klassen, Leanne Miele (2018), "Toronto Sun and Caribana Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Inphi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Ziptel Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


JMR Conglomeration SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Wong’s Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Novozymes B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


EG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Rayonier Advanced Materials SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing