×




Teaming for Time: The 6 AM Delivery Project at The Boston Globe (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Teaming for Time: The 6 AM Delivery Project at The Boston Globe (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Teaming for Time: The 6 AM Delivery Project at The Boston Globe (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Phyllis Schlesinger, David Wylie, Michael Lelyveld. The Teaming for Time: The 6 AM Delivery Project at The Boston Globe (B) (referred as “A.m Delivery” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Leading teams, Manufacturing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Teaming for Time: The 6 AM Delivery Project at The Boston Globe (B) Case Study


After careful planning, coordination, and consensus-building a diverse set of stakeholders, the Boston Globe newspaper implemented the changes necessary to move its home delivery deadline from 7 a.m. to 6 a.m.. Anne Eisenmenger, who had been charged with this responsibility, reflects on the challenge and describes how 20 minutes each were captured from editorial, product, and delivery.


Case Authors : Phyllis Schlesinger, David Wylie, Michael Lelyveld

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Leadership, Leading teams, Manufacturing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Teaming for Time: The 6 AM Delivery Project at The Boston Globe (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017487) -10017487 - -
Year 1 3468790 -6548697 3468790 0.9434 3272443
Year 2 3963586 -2585111 7432376 0.89 3527577
Year 3 3975161 1390050 11407537 0.8396 3337622
Year 4 3222624 4612674 14630161 0.7921 2552620
TOTAL 14630161 12690263




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672776

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. A.m Delivery shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of A.m Delivery have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Teaming for Time: The 6 AM Delivery Project at The Boston Globe (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at A.m Delivery often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at A.m Delivery needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017487) -10017487 - -
Year 1 3468790 -6548697 3468790 0.8696 3016339
Year 2 3963586 -2585111 7432376 0.7561 2997040
Year 3 3975161 1390050 11407537 0.6575 2613733
Year 4 3222624 4612674 14630161 0.5718 1842546
TOTAL 10469658


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452171

(10469658 - 10017487 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017487) -10017487 - -
Year 1 3468790 -6548697 3468790 0.8333 2890658
Year 2 3963586 -2585111 7432376 0.6944 2752490
Year 3 3975161 1390050 11407537 0.5787 2300440
Year 4 3222624 4612674 14630161 0.4823 1554120
TOTAL 9497709


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519778

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497709 - 10017487 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of A.m Delivery to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of A.m Delivery has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at A.m Delivery can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at A.m Delivery, then the stock price of the A.m Delivery should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at A.m Delivery should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Teaming for Time: The 6 AM Delivery Project at The Boston Globe (B)

References & Further Readings

Phyllis Schlesinger, David Wylie, Michael Lelyveld (2018), "Teaming for Time: The 6 AM Delivery Project at The Boston Globe (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


HCA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Fangyuan Slewing A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


LendingClub Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Nishikawa Rubber SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Brady SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Security Systems & Services


Escalade SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


London Biscuits SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


CI Resources Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining