×




Alexander Bandelli (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Alexander Bandelli (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Alexander Bandelli (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Thomas J. DeLong, Catherine Conneely. The Alexander Bandelli (A) (referred as “Alexander Bandelli” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Managing people.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Alexander Bandelli (A) Case Study


Alexander Bandelli has the opportunity to redefine the way real estate business is done in the Northeast region. He has just joined Ronsini and Fitch and has been asked by senior management to move to a client focus rather than the older, traditional transaction focus. Alexander has many challenges before him. How should he prioritize his work? Does he focus outside the organization or internally? Is the organization prepared for this change project? What should he do first?


Case Authors : Thomas J. DeLong, Catherine Conneely

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Managing people




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Alexander Bandelli (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001898) -10001898 - -
Year 1 3471226 -6530672 3471226 0.9434 3274742
Year 2 3963262 -2567410 7434488 0.89 3527289
Year 3 3949438 1382028 11383926 0.8396 3316024
Year 4 3228832 4610860 14612758 0.7921 2557537
TOTAL 14612758 12675592




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2673694

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Alexander Bandelli shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Alexander Bandelli have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Alexander Bandelli (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Alexander Bandelli often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Alexander Bandelli needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001898) -10001898 - -
Year 1 3471226 -6530672 3471226 0.8696 3018457
Year 2 3963262 -2567410 7434488 0.7561 2996795
Year 3 3949438 1382028 11383926 0.6575 2596820
Year 4 3228832 4610860 14612758 0.5718 1846095
TOTAL 10458168


The Net NPV after 4 years is 456270

(10458168 - 10001898 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001898) -10001898 - -
Year 1 3471226 -6530672 3471226 0.8333 2892688
Year 2 3963262 -2567410 7434488 0.6944 2752265
Year 3 3949438 1382028 11383926 0.5787 2285554
Year 4 3228832 4610860 14612758 0.4823 1557114
TOTAL 9487622


The Net NPV after 4 years is -514276

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487622 - 10001898 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Alexander Bandelli to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Alexander Bandelli has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Alexander Bandelli can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Alexander Bandelli, then the stock price of the Alexander Bandelli should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Alexander Bandelli should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Alexander Bandelli (A)

References & Further Readings

Thomas J. DeLong, Catherine Conneely (2018), "Alexander Bandelli (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Yamada SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Autek China SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Glacier Media Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Mercialys SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Lockheed Martin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Bassett SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Softmax SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


IG Port SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


Hudson Pacific SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations