×




Hong Kong's Container Truckers: The Mid-Stream Fee Dispute Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Hong Kong's Container Truckers: The Mid-Stream Fee Dispute case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Hong Kong's Container Truckers: The Mid-Stream Fee Dispute case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael J. Enright, Vincent Mak. The Hong Kong's Container Truckers: The Mid-Stream Fee Dispute (referred as “Hkmoa Truckers” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Customers, Government, Negotiations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Hong Kong's Container Truckers: The Mid-Stream Fee Dispute Case Study


In November 2000, the eight-member Hong Kong Mid-Stream Operators Association (HKMOA), which controlled 90% of the mid-stream container handling business in Hong Kong, announced that it would charge shippers an extra fee. When the shippers refused to pay that fee, the HKMOA asked the container truck drivers, who delivered the containers to the mid-stream depots, to pay it and then claim it back from the shippers. The truckers refused. A series of industrial actions ensued, and the government, shippers, and liners were involved in subsequent negotiations. The rounds of tussles between the HKMOA and the truckers lasted into 2001. Eventually, the HKMOA won: The truckers had to pay the mid-stream fee, although in many cases, could not recoup it from the shippers. Why did the truckers become the victims of the HKMOA? How could the mid-stream operators win? What could public policy makers do to prevent similar disputes from happening again? What could the truck drivers, who in many cases were self-employed, do to protect themselves from more new charges in the future?


Case Authors : Michael J. Enright, Vincent Mak

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Customers, Government, Negotiations




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Hong Kong's Container Truckers: The Mid-Stream Fee Dispute Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024488) -10024488 - -
Year 1 3466944 -6557544 3466944 0.9434 3270702
Year 2 3963536 -2594008 7430480 0.89 3527533
Year 3 3947947 1353939 11378427 0.8396 3314772
Year 4 3222810 4576749 14601237 0.7921 2552767
TOTAL 14601237 12665775




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641287

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Hkmoa Truckers have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Hkmoa Truckers shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Hong Kong's Container Truckers: The Mid-Stream Fee Dispute

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Hkmoa Truckers often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Hkmoa Truckers needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024488) -10024488 - -
Year 1 3466944 -6557544 3466944 0.8696 3014734
Year 2 3963536 -2594008 7430480 0.7561 2997003
Year 3 3947947 1353939 11378427 0.6575 2595839
Year 4 3222810 4576749 14601237 0.5718 1842652
TOTAL 10450228


The Net NPV after 4 years is 425740

(10450228 - 10024488 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024488) -10024488 - -
Year 1 3466944 -6557544 3466944 0.8333 2889120
Year 2 3963536 -2594008 7430480 0.6944 2752456
Year 3 3947947 1353939 11378427 0.5787 2284692
Year 4 3222810 4576749 14601237 0.4823 1554210
TOTAL 9480477


The Net NPV after 4 years is -544011

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9480477 - 10024488 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Hkmoa Truckers to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Hkmoa Truckers has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Hkmoa Truckers can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Hkmoa Truckers, then the stock price of the Hkmoa Truckers should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Hkmoa Truckers should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Hong Kong's Container Truckers: The Mid-Stream Fee Dispute

References & Further Readings

Michael J. Enright, Vincent Mak (2018), "Hong Kong's Container Truckers: The Mid-Stream Fee Dispute Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


US Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Sonoma Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Semen Indonesia Persero SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Indigo Star SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


CBK SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Restaurants


UOA Development SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Lippo Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services