×




Ford Motor Co.: Dealer Sales and Service Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Ford Motor Co.: Dealer Sales and Service case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Ford Motor Co.: Dealer Sales and Service case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Leonard A. Schlesinger, Mark Pelofsky. The Ford Motor Co.: Dealer Sales and Service (referred as “Ford Differentiation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Customer service, Customers, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Ford Motor Co.: Dealer Sales and Service Case Study


Since Henry Ford founded Ford Motor Co., Ford vehicles have been sold and serviced the same way. By the late 1980s Ford began to consider making changes in its sales and service process. Two developments forced Ford to reconsider these processes. First, Ford found through various surveys that customers had very clear complaints about the way they were treated by car dealers. Second, with more rapid technology transfer among the automakers, product differentiation was declining. Therefore, the channels of distribution provided one of the final potential points of differentiation between automakers. This case gives the students all of the conclusions from the studies Ford had done and asks them to redesign the sales and service process to address customers' complaints and become a point of differentiation for Ford.


Case Authors : Leonard A. Schlesinger, Mark Pelofsky

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Customer service, Customers, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Ford Motor Co.: Dealer Sales and Service Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007522) -10007522 - -
Year 1 3452199 -6555323 3452199 0.9434 3256792
Year 2 3953334 -2601989 7405533 0.89 3518453
Year 3 3966468 1364479 11372001 0.8396 3330323
Year 4 3244500 4608979 14616501 0.7921 2569948
TOTAL 14616501 12675516




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2667994

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ford Differentiation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ford Differentiation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Ford Motor Co.: Dealer Sales and Service

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ford Differentiation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ford Differentiation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007522) -10007522 - -
Year 1 3452199 -6555323 3452199 0.8696 3001912
Year 2 3953334 -2601989 7405533 0.7561 2989288
Year 3 3966468 1364479 11372001 0.6575 2608017
Year 4 3244500 4608979 14616501 0.5718 1855053
TOTAL 10454271


The Net NPV after 4 years is 446749

(10454271 - 10007522 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007522) -10007522 - -
Year 1 3452199 -6555323 3452199 0.8333 2876833
Year 2 3953334 -2601989 7405533 0.6944 2745371
Year 3 3966468 1364479 11372001 0.5787 2295410
Year 4 3244500 4608979 14616501 0.4823 1564670
TOTAL 9482283


The Net NPV after 4 years is -525239

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482283 - 10007522 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ford Differentiation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ford Differentiation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ford Differentiation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ford Differentiation, then the stock price of the Ford Differentiation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ford Differentiation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Ford Motor Co.: Dealer Sales and Service

References & Further Readings

Leonard A. Schlesinger, Mark Pelofsky (2018), "Ford Motor Co.: Dealer Sales and Service Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


China Unicom Hong Kong SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Tianma Microelec A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Samwha Electri SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Pacific Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Sasakura Engineering SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Albert David SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Raj Oil Mills Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Jiangxi Huangshanghuang Food A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Jounce Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Mitsui O.S.K. Lines SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Pagegroup SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services