×




Managing in an Information Age: IT Challenges and Opportunities Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Managing in an Information Age: IT Challenges and Opportunities case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Managing in an Information Age: IT Challenges and Opportunities case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Lynda M. Applegate. The Managing in an Information Age: IT Challenges and Opportunities (referred as “Age Architecture” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Organizational structure, Reorganization.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Managing in an Information Age: IT Challenges and Opportunities Case Study


The co-evolution of technology, work, and the workforce over the past 30 years has dramatically influenced our concept of organizations and the industries within which they compete. No longer simply a tool to support "back-office" transactions, IT has become a strategic part of most businesses, enabling the redefinition of markets and industries and the strategies and designs of firms competing within them. But to achieve these information age benefits, companies must adopt information age technology architectures. Organizations must radically transform outdated IT architectures and the IT organizations required to support them. The technological transformation is every bit as daunting as the organizational transformation. This note, along with Designing and Managing the Information Age IT Architecture, describes general frameworks and concepts that managers can use to analyze their existing IT architecture and to define and manage the IT architecture required to support the information processing requirements of the Information Age organization.


Case Authors : Lynda M. Applegate

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : IT, Organizational structure, Reorganization




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Managing in an Information Age: IT Challenges and Opportunities Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022349) -10022349 - -
Year 1 3454049 -6568300 3454049 0.9434 3258537
Year 2 3977491 -2590809 7431540 0.89 3539953
Year 3 3939466 1348657 11371006 0.8396 3307652
Year 4 3238334 4586991 14609340 0.7921 2565064
TOTAL 14609340 12671205




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2648856

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Age Architecture shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Age Architecture have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Managing in an Information Age: IT Challenges and Opportunities

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Age Architecture often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Age Architecture needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022349) -10022349 - -
Year 1 3454049 -6568300 3454049 0.8696 3003521
Year 2 3977491 -2590809 7431540 0.7561 3007555
Year 3 3939466 1348657 11371006 0.6575 2590263
Year 4 3238334 4586991 14609340 0.5718 1851528
TOTAL 10452866


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430517

(10452866 - 10022349 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022349) -10022349 - -
Year 1 3454049 -6568300 3454049 0.8333 2878374
Year 2 3977491 -2590809 7431540 0.6944 2762147
Year 3 3939466 1348657 11371006 0.5787 2279784
Year 4 3238334 4586991 14609340 0.4823 1561697
TOTAL 9482001


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540348

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482001 - 10022349 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Age Architecture to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Age Architecture has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Age Architecture can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Age Architecture, then the stock price of the Age Architecture should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Age Architecture should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Managing in an Information Age: IT Challenges and Opportunities

References & Further Readings

Lynda M. Applegate (2018), "Managing in an Information Age: IT Challenges and Opportunities Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Dynafond SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Champion Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Takara Holdings Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Activision Blizzard SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Kaneshita Construction SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Netcompany SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Arcus Biosciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Tandem Diabetes Care SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Inix Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Vapor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Grocery)


Yuhua Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment