×




Qualcomm and Intel: Evolving Strategies in the Mobile Chipset Industry in 2014 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Qualcomm and Intel: Evolving Strategies in the Mobile Chipset Industry in 2014 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Qualcomm and Intel: Evolving Strategies in the Mobile Chipset Industry in 2014 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John Thomas, Robert A. Burgelman. The Qualcomm and Intel: Evolving Strategies in the Mobile Chipset Industry in 2014 (referred as “Chipset Mobile” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Qualcomm and Intel: Evolving Strategies in the Mobile Chipset Industry in 2014 Case Study


This case discusses the evolving strategies in the mobile chipset industry in 2014, focusing on Qualcomm, the dominant technology company in the mobile industry and the leading chipset manufacturer. The case begins with the evolution of Qualcomm's communication technology, highlighting the company's consistent ability to lead the market in modem performance by deploying the latest, fastest communication technology. The case then details the competitive dynamics of Qualcomm's strategy, including its technology adoption strategy; its "whole product strategy" (products and services); its mobile carrier strategy; and its modem and CPU (central processing unit) integration strategy. The company decided early on not to sell a "modem-only" chipset, but rather to build an entire mobile chipset solution, eliminating the need for handset manufacturers to incorporate a separate CPU chip, which reduced their costs and improved Qualcomm's competitive position. The case also discusses the transition the mobile market was going through in 2014, driven by several technological and marketplace changes. Those changes included slowing radio link improvements (as the technology approached a performance limit), which could potentially give Qualcomm's competitors an opportunity to catch up to its technology. Other industry changes included the eroding power of mobile carriers and the growth of mobile subscribers in India and China, where demand was dramatically increasing for low-cost handsets. This made room for Taiwanese-based MediaTek to emerge as a strong player in the mobile chipset industry. Qualcomm also faced emerging competition from application processing and graphical processing players such as Nvidia. The case concludes with a discussion of a potential path for Intel to become a rising contender in the mobile chipset industry through its new low-power Atom microprocessor.


Case Authors : John Thomas, Robert A. Burgelman

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Globalization, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Qualcomm and Intel: Evolving Strategies in the Mobile Chipset Industry in 2014 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011257) -10011257 - -
Year 1 3470606 -6540651 3470606 0.9434 3274157
Year 2 3956879 -2583772 7427485 0.89 3521608
Year 3 3953102 1369330 11380587 0.8396 3319101
Year 4 3234009 4603339 14614596 0.7921 2561638
TOTAL 14614596 12676504




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2665247

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Chipset Mobile shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Chipset Mobile have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Qualcomm and Intel: Evolving Strategies in the Mobile Chipset Industry in 2014

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Chipset Mobile often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Chipset Mobile needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011257) -10011257 - -
Year 1 3470606 -6540651 3470606 0.8696 3017918
Year 2 3956879 -2583772 7427485 0.7561 2991969
Year 3 3953102 1369330 11380587 0.6575 2599229
Year 4 3234009 4603339 14614596 0.5718 1849055
TOTAL 10458171


The Net NPV after 4 years is 446914

(10458171 - 10011257 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011257) -10011257 - -
Year 1 3470606 -6540651 3470606 0.8333 2892172
Year 2 3956879 -2583772 7427485 0.6944 2747833
Year 3 3953102 1369330 11380587 0.5787 2287675
Year 4 3234009 4603339 14614596 0.4823 1559611
TOTAL 9487290


The Net NPV after 4 years is -523967

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487290 - 10011257 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Chipset Mobile to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Chipset Mobile has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Chipset Mobile can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Chipset Mobile, then the stock price of the Chipset Mobile should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Chipset Mobile should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Qualcomm and Intel: Evolving Strategies in the Mobile Chipset Industry in 2014

References & Further Readings

John Thomas, Robert A. Burgelman (2018), "Qualcomm and Intel: Evolving Strategies in the Mobile Chipset Industry in 2014 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Swisscom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Cptl Grp Hldngs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Verneuil SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Symphony Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


C-Mer Eye Care SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Yinhe Hi-Tech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Daelim C&S SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Prologue SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Sensata Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment