×




442 McAdam Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for 442 McAdam case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. 442 McAdam case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Elizabeth M.A. Grasby, Jessica Bond. The 442 McAdam (referred as “442 Mcadam” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Manufacturing, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of 442 McAdam Case Study


The owner of a designer handbag company, 442 McAdam, found she could no longer manufacture in-house the quantity of handbags required to meet existing orders. Manufacturing would need to be outsourced, and the owner would have to choose between a local manufacturer and an overseas manufacturer. Local manufacturers offered the same quality as overseas manufacturers but charged higher prices. International manufacturers, while offering lower prices, required larger minimum order quantities. Regardless of the manufacturing option she chose, the owner wondered whether the minimum levels of inventory she needed to order could be sold within the upcoming six-month style season.


Case Authors : Elizabeth M.A. Grasby, Jessica Bond

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Manufacturing, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for 442 McAdam Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026719) -10026719 - -
Year 1 3455643 -6571076 3455643 0.9434 3260041
Year 2 3968644 -2602432 7424287 0.89 3532079
Year 3 3962051 1359619 11386338 0.8396 3326614
Year 4 3242688 4602307 14629026 0.7921 2568513
TOTAL 14629026 12687247




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2660528

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of 442 Mcadam have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. 442 Mcadam shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of 442 McAdam

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at 442 Mcadam often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at 442 Mcadam needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026719) -10026719 - -
Year 1 3455643 -6571076 3455643 0.8696 3004907
Year 2 3968644 -2602432 7424287 0.7561 3000865
Year 3 3962051 1359619 11386338 0.6575 2605113
Year 4 3242688 4602307 14629026 0.5718 1854017
TOTAL 10464902


The Net NPV after 4 years is 438183

(10464902 - 10026719 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026719) -10026719 - -
Year 1 3455643 -6571076 3455643 0.8333 2879703
Year 2 3968644 -2602432 7424287 0.6944 2756003
Year 3 3962051 1359619 11386338 0.5787 2292854
Year 4 3242688 4602307 14629026 0.4823 1563796
TOTAL 9492355


The Net NPV after 4 years is -534364

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492355 - 10026719 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of 442 Mcadam to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of 442 Mcadam has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at 442 Mcadam can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at 442 Mcadam, then the stock price of the 442 Mcadam should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at 442 Mcadam should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of 442 McAdam

References & Further Readings

Elizabeth M.A. Grasby, Jessica Bond (2018), "442 McAdam Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


BlackRock SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Toshiba Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Waps SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


ABHOTEL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Hotels & Motels


Flexion Theraptc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


HRL Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Indiva SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Techno Associe SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products