Eli Lilly and Co.: Manufacturing Process Technology Strategy--1991 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Eli Lilly and Co.: Manufacturing Process Technology Strategy--1991 case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Eli Lilly and Co.: Manufacturing Process Technology Strategy--1991 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Steven C. Wheelwright, Gary P. Pisano, Jonathan West. The Eli Lilly and Co.: Manufacturing Process Technology Strategy--1991 (referred as “Manufacturing Lilly's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Manufacturing, Product development, Productivity.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Eli Lilly and Co.: Manufacturing Process Technology Strategy--1991 Case Study

Outlines the evolution of Lilly's corporate manufacturing strategy over the past decade. The corporate vice president of manufacturing must decide on the next phase of Lilly's strategy for the early 1990s, as well as to what extent and what role process development will play. Provides data outlining three different points in the product development process at which manufacturing process development might be initiated. Using learning curve concepts and data, students can estimate the economic costs and benefits (as well as organizational issues and challenges) associated with each. Illustrates process improvement's substantial impact in a capital-intensive industry, describes possible roles of manufacturing process technology in an industry that has viewed product R&D as its primary competitive advantage, illustrates phases through which manufacturing can evolve in pursuit of comparative advantage, and introduces students to a challenging and changing industry.

Case Authors : Steven C. Wheelwright, Gary P. Pisano, Jonathan West

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Manufacturing, Product development, Productivity

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Eli Lilly and Co.: Manufacturing Process Technology Strategy--1991 Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009472)	-10009472	-	-
Year 1	3470368	-6539104	3470368	0.9434	3273932
Year 2	3979129	-2559975	7449497	0.89	3541411
Year 3	3948300	1388325	11397797	0.8396	3315069
Year 4	3226488	4614813	14624285	0.7921	2555681
TOTAL			14624285		12686092

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676620

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Manufacturing Lilly's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Manufacturing Lilly's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Eli Lilly and Co.: Manufacturing Process Technology Strategy--1991

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Manufacturing Lilly's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Manufacturing Lilly's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009472)	-10009472	-	-
Year 1	3470368	-6539104	3470368	0.8696	3017711
Year 2	3979129	-2559975	7449497	0.7561	3008793
Year 3	3948300	1388325	11397797	0.6575	2596071
Year 4	3226488	4614813	14624285	0.5718	1844755
TOTAL					10467331

The Net NPV after 4 years is 457859

(10467331 - 10009472 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009472)	-10009472	-	-
Year 1	3470368	-6539104	3470368	0.8333	2891973
Year 2	3979129	-2559975	7449497	0.6944	2763284
Year 3	3948300	1388325	11397797	0.5787	2284896
Year 4	3226488	4614813	14624285	0.4823	1555984
TOTAL					9496137

The Net NPV after 4 years is -513335

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9496137 - 10009472 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Manufacturing Lilly's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Manufacturing Lilly's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Manufacturing Lilly's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Manufacturing Lilly's, then the stock price of the Manufacturing Lilly's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Manufacturing Lilly's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Eli Lilly and Co.: Manufacturing Process Technology Strategy--1991

References & Further Readings

Steven C. Wheelwright, Gary P. Pisano, Jonathan West (2018), "Eli Lilly and Co.: Manufacturing Process Technology Strategy--1991 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.