×




Michigan's Social Venture Fund: Founding the Nation's First Student-Run Impact Investing Fund Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Michigan's Social Venture Fund: Founding the Nation's First Student-Run Impact Investing Fund case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Michigan's Social Venture Fund: Founding the Nation's First Student-Run Impact Investing Fund case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Gautam Kaul. The Michigan's Social Venture Fund: Founding the Nation's First Student-Run Impact Investing Fund (referred as “Impact Investing” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Ethics, Social enterprise.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Michigan's Social Venture Fund: Founding the Nation's First Student-Run Impact Investing Fund Case Study


In the business environment surrounding the 2008 financial crisis, a new field within investing emerged to address the shortcomings of a "profit-only" mission of business. The nascent impact investing industry sought to create positive impact beyond financial returns. Putting this idyllic-sounding idea into practice demanded that institutions interested in this line of work consider what social impact means, how to assess it, how returns in impact investments would differ from traditional investments, and where to invest capital. Four students at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business realized the flawed structure of the financial system and wanted to see how they and their university could play a role in the impact investing industry. Collaborating with faculty and industry professionals, the students conceived the idea of a student-run venture capital fund that would invest in companies for both financial and social returns. Social Venture Fund was the first of any such organization on any campus. Before the students could even make an investment, however, they had to decide on the nature of their organization. The students wrestled with four questions at the same time as the overall impact investing industry was struggling with the identical questions: How would they define impact? What would their investment thesis be? How would they measure impact? In which sectors and geographies would they invest?


Case Authors : Gautam Kaul

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Ethics, Social enterprise




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Michigan's Social Venture Fund: Founding the Nation's First Student-Run Impact Investing Fund Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028830) -10028830 - -
Year 1 3462528 -6566302 3462528 0.9434 3266536
Year 2 3965831 -2600471 7428359 0.89 3529575
Year 3 3963206 1362735 11391565 0.8396 3327584
Year 4 3244327 4607062 14635892 0.7921 2569811
TOTAL 14635892 12693506




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2664676

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Impact Investing have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Impact Investing shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Michigan's Social Venture Fund: Founding the Nation's First Student-Run Impact Investing Fund

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Impact Investing often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Impact Investing needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028830) -10028830 - -
Year 1 3462528 -6566302 3462528 0.8696 3010894
Year 2 3965831 -2600471 7428359 0.7561 2998738
Year 3 3963206 1362735 11391565 0.6575 2605872
Year 4 3244327 4607062 14635892 0.5718 1854954
TOTAL 10470459


The Net NPV after 4 years is 441629

(10470459 - 10028830 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028830) -10028830 - -
Year 1 3462528 -6566302 3462528 0.8333 2885440
Year 2 3965831 -2600471 7428359 0.6944 2754049
Year 3 3963206 1362735 11391565 0.5787 2293522
Year 4 3244327 4607062 14635892 0.4823 1564587
TOTAL 9497598


The Net NPV after 4 years is -531232

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497598 - 10028830 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Impact Investing to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Impact Investing has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Impact Investing can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Impact Investing, then the stock price of the Impact Investing should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Impact Investing should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Michigan's Social Venture Fund: Founding the Nation's First Student-Run Impact Investing Fund

References & Further Readings

Gautam Kaul (2018), "Michigan's Social Venture Fund: Founding the Nation's First Student-Run Impact Investing Fund Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Home Depot SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Home Improvement)


EDP Renovaveis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


HKS SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Eneabba Gas Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Breedon Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Dae Hyun SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


ProLogis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Cambrex SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Beijing E-techstar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


APM Automotive SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel