Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Martin Persson, Mitchell Stein, Spencer Higgs. The Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation (referred as “Tesla's Gaap” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation Case Study

In November 2014, questions were raised about American electric car manufacturer Tesla Motors Inc.'s (Tesla's) accounting practices, which did not follow the generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP). Tesla's third quarter 2014 financial statements showed a loss of almost US$75 million when using U.S. GAAP standards, compared to a profit of over $5 million when using its own non-GAAP standards. The accounting discrepancy between the two systems was due mainly to the allotment of vehicle buybacks, stock-based compensation, and regulatory credit sales. Tesla's share price had risen to $242 from its initial public offering of $17. Had the company's non-GAAP adjustments influenced investors' perception of Tesla's performance and, therefore, the resulting stock price? Specifically, was it reasonable to state that Tesla had been profitable in the third quarter of 2014? Were Tesla's non-GAAP adjustments appropriate? How could the adjustments between Tesla's GAAP and non-GAAP numbers be explained? What would Tesla's performance look like if the financial statements were adjusted for the resale value guarantee, regulatory credits, and stock-based compensation?

Case Authors : Martin Persson, Mitchell Stein, Spencer Higgs

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas :

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10005631)	-10005631	-	-
Year 1	3472639	-6532992	3472639	0.9434	3276075
Year 2	3976149	-2556843	7448788	0.89	3538758
Year 3	3950454	1393611	11399242	0.8396	3316877
Year 4	3244440	4638051	14643682	0.7921	2569900
TOTAL			14643682		12701611

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2695980

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tesla's Gaap have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tesla's Gaap shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tesla's Gaap often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tesla's Gaap needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10005631)	-10005631	-	-
Year 1	3472639	-6532992	3472639	0.8696	3019686
Year 2	3976149	-2556843	7448788	0.7561	3006540
Year 3	3950454	1393611	11399242	0.6575	2597488
Year 4	3244440	4638051	14643682	0.5718	1855019
TOTAL					10478733

The Net NPV after 4 years is 473102

(10478733 - 10005631 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10005631)	-10005631	-	-
Year 1	3472639	-6532992	3472639	0.8333	2893866
Year 2	3976149	-2556843	7448788	0.6944	2761215
Year 3	3950454	1393611	11399242	0.5787	2286142
Year 4	3244440	4638051	14643682	0.4823	1564641
TOTAL					9505864

The Net NPV after 4 years is -499767

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505864 - 10005631 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tesla's Gaap to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tesla's Gaap has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tesla's Gaap can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tesla's Gaap, then the stock price of the Tesla's Gaap should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tesla's Gaap should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation

References & Further Readings

Martin Persson, Mitchell Stein, Spencer Higgs (2018), "Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.