×




EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Luiz Felipe Monteiro, Anne-Marie Carrick. The EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista (referred as “Batista Ebx” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista Case Study


This is a condensed version of the cases EBX Group (A): Eike Batista and the X-Factor/EBX Group (B): Autopsy of a failure. It describes the boom and bust of the EBX Group and its founder, Eike Batista. The first part traces the history of the Brazilian conglomerate from its origins as a small gold-mining operation in the early 1980s to 2012 when it has become a diversified national and global player in multiple industries. It examines Batista's personal drive, motivations and choices, and how these influenced the strategy deployed by the company. Known for his huge 'risk appetite', Batista had an extraordinary ability to exploit gaps in the market when starting new businesses. The second part of the case recounts the "historic" downfall of the 'X Empire' which was of a magnitude and speed never seen before in the history. Batista's personal net worth of US$30 billion - making him the seventh wealthiest person in the world and the richest in Brazil - had plummeted to US$200 million as debts piled up and the stock price went into freefall. In January 2014, Bloomberg reported that Batista had "a negative net worth".


Case Authors : Luiz Felipe Monteiro, Anne-Marie Carrick

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028922) -10028922 - -
Year 1 3458431 -6570491 3458431 0.9434 3262671
Year 2 3976518 -2593973 7434949 0.89 3539087
Year 3 3960909 1366936 11395858 0.8396 3325656
Year 4 3249045 4615981 14644903 0.7921 2573548
TOTAL 14644903 12700961




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672039

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Batista Ebx have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Batista Ebx shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Batista Ebx often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Batista Ebx needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028922) -10028922 - -
Year 1 3458431 -6570491 3458431 0.8696 3007331
Year 2 3976518 -2593973 7434949 0.7561 3006819
Year 3 3960909 1366936 11395858 0.6575 2604362
Year 4 3249045 4615981 14644903 0.5718 1857652
TOTAL 10476164


The Net NPV after 4 years is 447242

(10476164 - 10028922 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028922) -10028922 - -
Year 1 3458431 -6570491 3458431 0.8333 2882026
Year 2 3976518 -2593973 7434949 0.6944 2761471
Year 3 3960909 1366936 11395858 0.5787 2292193
Year 4 3249045 4615981 14644903 0.4823 1566862
TOTAL 9502551


The Net NPV after 4 years is -526371

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9502551 - 10028922 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Batista Ebx to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Batista Ebx has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Batista Ebx can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Batista Ebx, then the stock price of the Batista Ebx should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Batista Ebx should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista

References & Further Readings

Luiz Felipe Monteiro, Anne-Marie Carrick (2018), "EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Akatsuki SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


HSBC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Sunzen Biotech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Algoma Central Corporation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Bank of Montreal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Money Center Banks


Soco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


MakeMyTrip SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


ADDvantage SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Kec Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Focusrite PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment